IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Fri, 30 August 2013 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA15811E8111 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEPh5N75S3sm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E13011E8103 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6537F4A4CAD6; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:38:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjyQhekBCUOl; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:38:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 866C94A4CACB; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:38:31 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
Message-ID: <3B833B3E8A7BD501E72E1C85@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhwrNuYfAKri+hK328ULOZwv+sh=rUXm4pAYziMRBW78w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <314C280ADBC42CC60123EF3D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAMm+LwhwrNuYfAKri+hK328ULOZwv+sh=rUXm4pAYziMRBW78w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="629"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:38:43 -0000

Hi Phillip,

--On August 30, 2013 at 10:16:46 AM -0400 Phillip Hallam-Baker 
<hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Service discovery requires prefixes.
>
> Here is a draft that works fine (except for the IETF review mistake). Just
> put IETF last call on it:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gudmundsson-dns-srv-iana-registry-04

I believe that draft was superseded by RFC6335 and all service names (SRV 
prefix labels) are now recorded at 
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml> 
- indeed several of those come from RFCs I have written that add new SRV 
names.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email