Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.

So then Frank -  this is an opportunity to not only correct that, but also
to create a CI nexus which would be a good thing for the IETF to focus on I
think.

At least from a Business Development venue, it seems to offer a whole
possibility of a new CI Area in the IETF as well.  That would mean a new AD
and a new seat for the IESG as well as probably a bunch of WG's  which would
popup to address standardization of many things that governments of the
World are frantically trying to accomplish now.

t
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.

> todd glassey wrote:
>
> > Any commentary?
>
> For me it sounds like a proposal to reinvent the IAB as WG.
> Some draft-iab-whatever and resulting RFCs like 4690 are
> quite interesting, examples:
>
> draft-iab-auth-mech-05
> draft-iab-dns-choices-03
> draft-iab-dos-05
> draft-iab-messaging-report-01
>
> That they tolerated the simultaneous SHOULD NOT vs. SHOULD
> "experiments" with critical e-mail was a counter-example.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf