Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Thu, 05 October 2006 19:31 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVYw3-0004L9-Hu; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:31:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVYw2-0004L4-I7 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:31:10 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVYw1-0001SO-8q for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:31:10 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GVYvS-0004Wp-3T for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:30:34 +0200
Received: from pd9fba984.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.169.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:30:34 +0200
Received: from nobody by pd9fba984.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:30:34 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:24:37 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <45255BF5.22C3@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <006b01c6e89d$0e12f230$010aa8c0@home.glassey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9fba984.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Subject: Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
todd glassey wrote: > Any commentary? For me it sounds like a proposal to reinvent the IAB as WG. Some draft-iab-whatever and resulting RFCs like 4690 are quite interesting, examples: draft-iab-auth-mech-05 draft-iab-dns-choices-03 draft-iab-dos-05 draft-iab-messaging-report-01 That they tolerated the simultaneous SHOULD NOT vs. SHOULD "experiments" with critical e-mail was a counter-example. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG. todd glassey
- Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei W… Thomas Narten
- Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei W… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei W… todd glassey