IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Wed, 03 December 2014 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343FC1A0086; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:58:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RX0KALJ52EIS; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:58:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF6251A007E; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so18845282wgh.10 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 20:58:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=skhCQDrF5Y4JdCho4x55p3qN1VDo0A1wj85Rl+5WSqc=; b=vH3AozG3Uu9Ag1hucp4DsnL0n0xYs3UvqP99SFR745nGo5TyMjGEoyznkGbXIDFVxt 1xO4IuabzsgTvUB9an31ES/b8Eh5IfWKiVU5jUFdFqq4BpKiZpKw9+9OgdUJo2OHEkMi 5SpJJSQzEAKhXsOOBZJj3oWSqsdRZbRehwGufZT3Ef5x8qRDEtmCoizx7lhnsckruUjU o4a5FQM8zyzuCmT7uVsrLetpYRseyqgk7JuxEu5+C6vML8ASaRg+DjAymHvdALPKvplE jtPtQFlzku0kxvM0zNIpNTtNL3LIojd/qqxyCpqm6+5EoMDHQRunNsbcpTs/I3W8mf+L hriQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.76.144 with SMTP id k16mr10121776wiw.3.1417582701567; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 20:58:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.177.218 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:58:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <547E96C1.5060703@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <546FB4E7.7060704@nostrum.com> <547DE944.9000709@nostrum.com> <CALaySJ+gpLBcVCF_kwbPf4MkQr_8nm5KsZaHXH_FDCaZFF7=Og@mail.gmail.com> <547DF327.6040803@nostrum.com> <CALaySJ+Kc_7siz8EGefJ+bR9d1ztwPvbwR7AA55e9v6Mx550ng@mail.gmail.com> <547E96C1.5060703@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:58:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN40gSupwZJ=BCCOPfUhxE1SuO49wkFmdZicqWsi_AmHL0ds9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043749415de62f050948b1c5"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FtwrPnnMm87dWmBehogV9h7_Y-A
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:22:00 -0800
Cc: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 04:58:25 -0000

Hi Pete and Robert,

My mistake - agreed - (c) should go - and no need for the note about PWG
IPP/2.0.
(which will get updated anyway to reference the IETF IPPS spec next year).

Cheers,
- Ira (wearing PWG IPP co-chair and IPP/2.0 co-editor hats)

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
wrote:

> On 12/2/14 11:20 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
>> When you suggest saying more, are you suggesting saying more in the
>>>> document?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I mostly meant the writeup - I expect there will be IESG folks with the
>>> same
>>> questions I had.
>>>
>>>
>> I can do that, sure.
>>
>>
>>
>>>     This document updates:
>>>      ...
>>>     c) IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP Version 2.0 Second Edition [PWG5100.12], by
>>>        extending section 4 'IPP Standards' and section 10 'Security
>>>        Considerations'.
>>>
>>> This RFC-to-be is updating an IEEE-ISTO PWG document, and that seems
>>> exceptional enough to warrant mention about how the organizations
>>> are coordinating that update.
>>>
>>>
>> I'd think that's for PWG to address on their side, no?  If they accept
>> that they can have an IETF RFC formally updating one of their
>> documents, that's their process, not ours, no?
>>
>>
>
> This is to be an IETF document. If the PWG wants to say in one of their
> documents that PWG5100.12 is updated by this IETF document, that's their
> business. But *we* can't say in *our* document that we're updating their
> document. If you need a note, it could say:
>
>       Note: IEEE-ISTO PWG has indicated that they intend to use this
>       document as an update to their IPP Version 2.0 Second Edition
>       [PWG5100.12], by extending section 4 'IPP Standards' and section
>       10 'Security Considerations'.
>
> But (c) should go.
>
> pr
>
> --
> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email