IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17

Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <msweet@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4221A6FCD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:03:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bd1SS0fP-wNZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:03:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in7.apple.com (mail-out7.apple.com [17.151.62.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E721A7003 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1417546942; x=2281460542; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=P4i5fZA/gD2gtFefZ62X8zW6Ck/mQDiex0MBFJn+Y18=; b=I+h8KKd1KD5aQqkgft19c08UsSXNX6m/mTjYSaVM/HBB552kp1NX6Ze16YGMbZ/n ahV1VacQIX8wFz4HilAr3S8MMim0pDZlqYPQKp9qGpD+sQ9ExaPC8c2/dAzaI9JS 5Dpy+HZwe3N0OswSVaCCPVnZmpb84sO+XgHygRhSQ8zap7lbnqS9K9toSXa0T0Nx NNhGTjiwIzjs8RIaVQiqI4+E+K7lOMbE8b04l60Hjn/HN51mCFCQH4Q6O3SBtQDn qAQc/VYa9U9VGgq3iFX1x7c+ZLJEAfdPIgCjGVRXNz/IF6N70wOj+yZJw6sotmrj THWAvaytSWySFq4jTBgIHg==;
Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.102]) by mail-in7.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 47.CC.09658.EBC0E745; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e16-f79aa6d0000025ba-f8-547e0cbe800e
Received: from cardamom.apple.com (cardamom.apple.com [17.128.115.94]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 07.68.05452.1CC0E745; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.153.21.172] by cardamom.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NFY00JASY792W10@cardamom.apple.com>; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3FDAEED8-2CC1-43DF-9EC9-E9542FF3082F"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CALaySJ+Kc_7siz8EGefJ+bR9d1ztwPvbwR7AA55e9v6Mx550ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:01:54 -0500
Message-id: <2B39CB14-A041-46CE-A31E-FCA800DCB450@apple.com>
References: <546FB4E7.7060704@nostrum.com> <547DE944.9000709@nostrum.com> <CALaySJ+gpLBcVCF_kwbPf4MkQr_8nm5KsZaHXH_FDCaZFF7=Og@mail.gmail.com> <547DF327.6040803@nostrum.com> <CALaySJ+Kc_7siz8EGefJ+bR9d1ztwPvbwR7AA55e9v6Mx550ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCYpruPpy7EYMIXQYurrz6zWDzbOJ/F gcljyZKfTAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZzxpLC647VExa1M3ewPjXpouRk0NCwETi/KznjBC2 mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQE9jFKrFzfxgxT9H3XdhaIxEQmiU2f97JDOE8ZJR5eWcwCUiUs4C7Ruf8q mM0roCfR9OQxE0gRs8AURom9O+eDjWITUJP4PamPFcTmFAiW2HboCTuIzSKgKnH29wqwGmaB tYwS7/44QQyykZi6bxETxLYfjBJnHx5hA0mICGhKPP88hQniPlmJfxfPgJ0kIbCFTWLlsWns ExiFZiG5ZBayS2aBbdGWWLbwNZStJ/Gy6R07hG0q8eTtdjYI21ri55xHjBC2osSU7ofsCxjZ VzEK5SZm5uhm5pnrJRYU5KTqJefnbmIERch0O7EdjA9XWR1iFOBgVOLhPXm+JkSINbGsuDL3 EKM0B4uSOO8u/doQIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYwFC7dUxFY5GB8T2M8rsfsN X+r0NKkKieTGE7eqe5hVv+16c2uJ/wqDEkfRnyqaLw5lN6/W3f+MOXbGMW/x1rwM1x9dkxp1 zYK4eJ4lXt36b9bLo+cKNKO5X/11SUlOZ6x4uO7VSS82ZZ5lt//Ndtr6TULye/qkU9eNVpfP bXYPOc10cU3CN38lluKMREMt5qLiRAAsQHyhcQIAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAcp3uQpy7EYPJ+fourrz6zWDzbOJ/F gcljyZKfTAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZzxpLC647VExa1M3ewPjXpouRk0NCwETi+67tLBC2 mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQEJjJJbPq8lx3Cecoo8fDKYrAqYQF3ic79V8FsXgE9iaYnj5lAipgFpjBK 7N05nxkkwSagJvF7Uh8riM0pECyx7dATdhCbRUBV4uzvFWA1zAJrGSXe/XGCGGQjMXXfIiaI bT8YJc4+PMIGkhAR0JR4/nkKE8R9shL/Lp5hn8DIPwvJ8lnIls8CG6wtsWzhayhbT+Jl0zt2 CNtU4snb7WwQtrXEzzmPGCFsRYkp3Q/ZFzCyr2IUKErNSay00EssKMhJ1UvOz93ECA7owrQd jE3LrQ4xCnAwKvHwnjhfEyLEmlhWXJl7iFEFaMSjDasvMEqx5OXnpSqJ8P4yrg0R4k1JrKxK LcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkztv0KDdESCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwMj+Nu9Q0znuBfe9djzb piz0y3tXjQz/uzNXnmSVnu1enVb0zzT42M+qVieOzYxmHHdKEsVOL3o+3eR8/aFde9l2pn5q cks+7JU49WtYyWvujyezPdb/8jo2gWGN5wmpBdscXHaLmz13MGfcw6X5+UuWzNG5za72p7xL c4svG+zR/t7jvtBfdIUSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgA79mvucAIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kgDIEnpj2ulo-xQLFZtDUC19iwY
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:24:11 -0800
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:03:06 -0000

> On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>>> When you suggest saying more, are you suggesting saying more in the
>>> document?
>> 
>> I mostly meant the writeup - I expect there will be IESG folks with the same
>> questions I had.
> 
> I can do that, sure.
> 
>>   This document updates:
>>    ...
>>   c) IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP Version 2.0 Second Edition [PWG5100.12], by
>>      extending section 4 'IPP Standards' and section 10 'Security
>>      Considerations'.
>> 
>> This RFC-to-be is updating an IEEE-ISTO PWG document, and that seems
>> exceptional enough to warrant mention about how the organizations
>> are coordinating that update.
> 
> I'd think that's for PWG to address on their side, no?  If they accept
> that they can have an IETF RFC formally updating one of their
> documents, that's their process, not ours, no?

And FWIW, the sections in question currently reference RFC 3510 along with the various TLS RFCs.  At some point in the next year we will be updating IPP/2.0 to full IEEE standard, at which point the references in those sections will be updated accordingly.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email