AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary

Karl Heinz Wolf <karlheinz.wolf@nic.at> Mon, 03 January 2011 08:52 UTC

Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBAB23.C28D17B8"
Subject: AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:53:57 +0100
Message-ID: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D466509CFB2C7@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
In-Reply-To: <4d2178c4.0504d90a.5952.fffff508@mx.google.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary
Thread-Index: AcuTybiC/+hqNiudRUOFZK+8ttfUZgJ+qg7kA1RwsFAAAw+/sA==
References: <4cfa61a4.eaecd80a.64b7.ffff8243@mx.google.com> <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D466506876FA7@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at> <4d2178c4.0504d90a.5952.fffff508@mx.google.com>
From: Karl Heinz Wolf <karlheinz.wolf@nic.at>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Precedence: list

Hi Roni,

I issued the 05 version before I was aware of your review (since your mail got somehow lost in a spam filter). Robert pointed out your review to me and instructed me to note it to the RFC editor. I won't forget it. 

Thanks again for your review,

Karl

 

Von: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Montag, 03. Jänner 2011 08:17
An: Karl Heinz Wolf; 'General Area Review Team'; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'
Betreff: RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary

 

Hi Karl,

I looked at the 05 version and it does not look like you fixed the nits

Roni

 

From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:karlheinz.wolf@nic.at] 
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:28 AM
To: Roni Even; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: IETF-Discussion list
Subject: AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary

 

Roni,

thank you for your review and please apologize my delayed response.
I agree to your comments, the 2. one is really a good catch!

Thank you,
Karl



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ietf-bounces@ietf.org im Auftrag von Roni Even
Gesendet: Sa 12/4/2010 4:41
An: 'General Area Review Team'; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'
Betreff: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary

Hi,



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-04

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date: 2010-12-04

IETF LC End Date: 2010-12-14

IESG Telechat date: (if known)



Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. There are some nits



Major issues:



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:

1.      In the abstract the document starts with LoST,  Please expand to Location-to-Service Translation

2.      At the end of section 3.2  in the note, I think that the first "getServiceListBoundary" should be " getServiceBoundary"







Roni Even

Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-s… Roni Even
AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lo… Karl Heinz Wolf
RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lo… Roni Even
AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lo… Karl Heinz Wolf