Re: Scope for self-destructing email?

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Thu, 17 August 2017 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FF8132400 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GG9DhC2d1aJl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [IPv6:2607:f2f8:abf8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A890013226B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from minnie.hitronhub.home (S0106a84e3f81a003.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.126.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7H1llaL066599 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Scope for self-destructing email?
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <7352544b-8626-fb30-b74f-48b62110b7cf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:47:41 -0700
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org, vaibhavsinghacads@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39610B4F-8DE6-4E19-A6C8-5FAB882DD524@orthanc.ca>
References: <20170816225637.4431.qmail@ary.lan> <7352544b-8626-fb30-b74f-48b62110b7cf@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HjUHVTCP_MAp6_E8QlULx47cysM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:47:51 -0000

> On Aug 16, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Only, have you noticed any web pages expiring recently? Maybe there are
> browsers that annoy their users by not displaying expired pages?
> 
> Bits don't expire.

They do.  Is there a single web site on the planet these days that *doesn't* set the page cache time to 0? 

Then again, my Customer Experience is Enhanced by waiting for that 20 second reload, every time I press the "back" button in my phone's web browser.  It gives me time to flip to another tab and buy something for Instant Delivery from Amazon.  The package usually arrives before the other tab finishes reloading.

--lyndon