Re: Time zones in IETF agenda

t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Fri, 01 March 2013 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EED21F8A8F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:25:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.708, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbyiPYPp9sfK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E8221F89CB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail77-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.231) by CO1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.243.66.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:48 +0000
Received: from mail77-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail77-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC84F2A0077; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.250.181; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AMSPRD0711HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -28
X-BigFish: PS-28(zz8e8O98dI9371Ic3f2I542I1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dh8275bhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839h947hd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h304l1155h)
Received: from mail77-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail77-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1362140746364661_12328; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.237]) by mail77-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54174B80130; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AMSPRD0711HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.250.181) by CO1EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (10.243.66.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:42 +0000
Received: from DB3PRD0210HT003.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.69) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.242.14.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.263.1; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:25:37 +0000
Message-ID: <001f01ce1677$61ffdac0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20130226202823.DD1441A5D0@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp><363913E0-FFFB-4E55-9158-AFDB2F34A98D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|299023b6ce260ff4cdb522832c522124p1Q9KC03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|363913E0-FFFB-4E55-9158-AFDB2F34A98D@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Time zones in IETF agenda
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:21:55 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.69]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:25:50 -0000

Can anyone help an ignorant European?  Given a meeting time of 12:00
Noon ET [sic] on Sunday 10th March 2013, what is that in UTC?  Daylight
saving will have started by then in the USA but not in Europe so the
scope for being an hour late or an hour early is much increased.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Chown" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:20 AM
Subject: Time zones in IETF agenda


On 26 Feb 2013, at 20:28, Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> wrote:

> I have a recurring remote participation problem with the
> IETF Meeting Agendas, because it specifies the time of WG meeting
slots
> in local time (local to the IETF Meeting), but does not give the
> local time zone *anywhere*.
>
> I would appreciate if the local time zone indication would be added
> like somewhere at the top of the page, to each IETF meeting agenda.

So in this interesting discussion of UTC, Martin has actually made an
excellent point.  Having UTC listings for the agenda would be very
helpful, or an alternative agenda showing UTC.

Tim