Re: Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Today

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <grmocg@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A7A21F8788 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:50:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHQWFt-RBXyE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6BA21F8769 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o17so10397579oag.34 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=p6QJouDh0afcJrb766mwSrCs0Imb01/IUg7qW+HJ7Ls=; b=kLFrWnvt8plxLzvOV9IdLN1SohxgtfP8GNgVffyPbSfCDYmkJ3MA3ZGDGxXTU+fL+y CHbJTjwlvR+5jSEGmgAPSMb9AE4OnnO/EF21ooQe6KdsW/VXZ86uEcQmIuZqHiQREsaS 8EzRY5zNIYvRmnFLFLU5cScHVVIIoMmMeEJJqNZ8SF9ILoB/AqASl8K48k/gHSrz9c8t FZIdJEpkjkQkxIPbf+rnrgp2qwGHTVLVuKB36dfvk+UQj1Ih5mPpxkaGpVhfPzFctQZx 0iJX1gPVpVmi/+gBdeb8B9bKyG4iM6q/DF6hAx/OyMg8tz6ENMe1KTd+h5wG7iME+qi/ B1Uw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.13.162 with SMTP id i2mr17781095oec.121.1362455407345; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.109.72 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1303041918230.16935@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <20130225170532.25599.13118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <201302260047.r1Q0l2Im030997@rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com> <512C06EC.8050408@stpeter.im> <201302260058.r1Q0wBlI032453@rcdn-core-2.cisco.com> <201302261901.r1QJ17ZL2693351@shell01.TheWorld.com> <9354DE06-D414-47E2-9D23-6964B3CB7BAA@lurchi.franken.de> <512D0BC7.6080200@bogus.com> <512D0F7E.8030402@isi.edu> <512D1145.4060600@acm.org> <512D139D.8090305@isi.edu> <512D3968.50104@qti.qualcomm.com> <47BA0849-28A5-43A3-9F82-C27905CAF6D7@lilacglade.org> <01OQON8Q439C000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <0246891A-DD8F-4A7D-8880-BE95FA7B2365@tzi.org> <512E5729.7090005@network-heretics.com> <01OQOPQO9W32000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <512F1192.5000906@gmail.com> <CAP+FsNcwF4CmhQEh3HL2_mPgLkpV1OCOFtmevguHGwKfFSrj9w@mail.gmail.com> <513544DB.1080905@stpeter.im> <CAP+FsNf=QhEjO-=SCpk0YJ6=cY=TBxSrtCAh7te+4ErxR1qbkA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1303041918230.16935@egate.xpasc.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:50:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcqe1fOkJ+tbzWFqx1fvKsWci1f=SdQZSdPheytrL7Mig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Today
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8fb2011894124b04d7255ec5"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:50:08 -0000

No disagreement. It is merely *a* way, and, popping back to the original
topic, it is better to allow the submission and deny the visibility than to
disallow the submission

-=R


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:22 PM, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Roberto Peon wrote:
>
> > I think you mean backup solution, source control won't help on its own :)
>
> Source control, assuming the traditional server implementation, is one
> form of backup solution ... but I agree, the requirement is a backup
> solution where the backup is protected from the hazards the individual
> computer would be subjected to.
>
> Draft submission is hardly the best way to protect work.
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
> >wrote:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 3/4/13 2:53 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> > > > There was a fire in the office, three desks away from mine last
> > > > week during the weekend. Sprinklers came on. If my computer had
> > > > either caught fire, or been exposed to too much water (luckily
> > > > neither happened) the draft would have been lost.
> > >
> > > Nothing is stopping you from using source control. :-)
>