Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161A221F871D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:53:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEvVuc072ZvL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:53:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A048521F871C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,785,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="27981729"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2013 23:52:59 -0800
Received: from vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.34]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id r257qv5L027344; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.54]) by vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:52:57 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
Thread-Topic: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
Thread-Index: AQHOGQT+Pn7FVRW+Nkmym7U1pn05q5iWZLmAgADcPgA=
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:52:56 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F784CDA@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
References: <CAKFn1SEuNSHQMXKH2nc6E3Za=La7-jNfB+DW_exOsfjFrFYwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <3061.1362422679@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3061.1362422679@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <99B5DCB11A3ABA4B82F2CCAEE1D27C2D@tahoe.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<end2end-interest@postel.org>" <end2end-interest@postel.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:53:17 -0000

On Mar 4, 2013, at 19:44, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> The Transport Area has all of the groups that deal with transport
> protocols that need to do congestion control.   Further, the (current)
> split of work means that all of the groups that need congestion
> oversight would be cared for by the position that is currently becoming
> empty as Wes leaves.

Also, other areas frequently build protocols that need review from a congestion control perspective (do they back of under loss, can they even detect loss, etc.)

Inside the area, there is typically enough CC clue applied by the TSV community as a whole. It's outside the area where the TSV AD as a person gets involved a lot.

Lars