RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 11:55 UTC
Return-Path: <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C280E21F8713 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:55:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.949, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_PRICE=3.897, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2uznRChYVJ0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ukmta3.baesystems.com (ukmta3.baesystems.com [20.133.40.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3C821F8700 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:55:33 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,787,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="269550872"
Received: from unknown (HELO baemasodc004.greenlnk.net) ([10.108.36.11]) by Baemasodc001ir.sharelnk.net with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2013 11:55:33 +0000
Received: from baemasodc005.greenlnk.net ([10.108.52.29]) by baemasodc004.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id r25BtWxw006160 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:55:33 GMT
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,787,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="9477566"
Received: from glkxh0002v.greenlnk.net ([10.109.2.33]) by baemasodc005.greenlnk.net with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2013 11:55:32 +0000
Received: from GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net ([169.254.2.173]) by GLKXH0002V.GREENLNK.net ([10.109.2.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:55:32 +0000
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
To: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>, "braden@isi.edu" <braden@isi.edu>
Subject: RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
Thread-Topic: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
Thread-Index: AQHOGTo3SfgotF5eWkWEzeFxgTt9NJiW+yiw
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:55:32 +0000
Message-ID: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D2502A316@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
References: <5134EFEB.2090104@isi.edu> <20130305004135.34CCA1A5F4@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <20130305004135.34CCA1A5F4@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.109.62.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:55:40 -0000
I've no idea about the example quoted, but I can see some of their motivation. TCP's assumptions (really simplified) that loss of packet = congestion => backoff aren't necessarily so in a wireless network, where packets can be lost without congestion. This means that TCP into, out of, or across, a MANET using TCP can be bad. It then tends to happen that the MANET people don't fully understand TCP, and the TCP people don't fully understand MANETs. I don't have a single good reference for what I say above, in particular have things got better (or worse) as TCP evolves, and therefore which references are still valid? But the obvious Google search (TCP MANET) throws up various discussions. -- Christopher Dearlove Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK Tel: +44 1245 242194 | Fax: +44 1245 242124 chris.dearlove@baesystems.com | http://www.baesystems.com BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687 -----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Rex Sent: 05 March 2013 00:42 To: braden@isi.edu Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director) Bob Braden wrote: > On 3/4/2013 10:20 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > > I'll ask a rather basic question and hope someone will answer in an > > educational way - Why is congestion control so important? And where > > does it apply? ... :-) > > Ouch. Because without it (as we learned the hard way in the late 1980s) \ > the Internet may collapse and provide essentially no service. It is PR like this one: http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2013/20130129-02.html That gets me worried about folks might try to "fix" the internet mostly due to the fact that they really haven't understood what is already there any why. -Martin ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ********************************************************************
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Michael Richardson
- congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a T… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Bob Braden
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Martin Rex
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Eggert, Lars
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Eliot Lear
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… l.wood
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Wesley Eddy
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Cameron Byrne
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Wesley Eddy
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… t.p.
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… l.wood
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Cameron Byrne
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… John E Drake
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Toerless Eckert
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Toerless Eckert
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… t.p.