Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 09:54 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E1A21F8758 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:54:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.305
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrcIC1oodTgW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDAD21F8750 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:54:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=672; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362477282; x=1363686882; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EEpsfIJaR8y8aLSGeSa4StAviCzdKkZa/R9nMF/c8gc=; b=YHYzP1a35fPvv+63E5hIS7Yt1uFddyc5u72opZTZRaK8rSAWmnOZvsSn IxpRH+dIJLE7GVS+xtoDq0SnBomNMk3g/Jv/Em0LSmpAQoMrWt8B3Q39S ZAYOqXj8o7e8lz3bK9BwmeIfAr6QxdKHz4jZCNtIG/6uF1mslGNmKu4VD k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFANS/NVGQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABEhlC8BIECFnOCHwEBAQQjDwFFARALGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiA+rd4JAkD2BI41pB4ItgRMDlkqQboMJ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,786,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="151206285"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2013 09:54:39 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-82-131.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-82-131.cisco.com [10.55.82.131]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r259scuE029341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:54:38 GMT
Message-ID: <5135C0DD.2070501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:54:37 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director)
References: <CAKFn1SEuNSHQMXKH2nc6E3Za=La7-jNfB+DW_exOsfjFrFYwfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKFn1SEuNSHQMXKH2nc6E3Za=La7-jNfB+DW_exOsfjFrFYwfQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: end2end-interest@postel.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:54:43 -0000
Roger, On 3/4/13 7:20 PM, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > I'll ask a rather basic question and hope someone will answer in an > educational way - Why is congestion control so important? And where > does it apply? ... :-) That basic question is a very important one to ask from time to time. Others have already answered, and I will simply add one addition: the way one implements congestion control (or not) has impact not only on the party or parties with whom your computer is speaking, but on every communication that shares the links between your computer and those parties. So: get it wrong and you can hurt others. And it's easy to get wrong. Eliot
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Michael Richardson
- congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of a T… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Bob Braden
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Martin Rex
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Eggert, Lars
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Eliot Lear
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… l.wood
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Wesley Eddy
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Cameron Byrne
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Wesley Eddy
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… t.p.
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… l.wood
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Cameron Byrne
- RE: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… John E Drake
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Masataka Ohta
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Toerless Eckert
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… Toerless Eckert
- Re: congestion control? - (was Re: Appointment of… t.p.