IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 27 January 2016 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E311B2E5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xQ55YmS-cb4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7121B2E18 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:02:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41A2CCBF; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pU4dOc2FHzjv; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:08 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B3F2CC6C; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:08 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D04F6DF7-5A31-402B-A315-E9FD788D1B6A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <56A897AE.9060900@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:07 +0200
Message-Id: <C30CD942-8C7E-44D9-8454-DA9E4C833AA5@piuha.net>
References: <20160125231333.27786.50459.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56A897AE.9060900@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IV58WpLn-VzoWIA-o0OWVRh8P-o>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:02:19 -0000

Ack - thanks for the question/feedback. I’d have a personal perspective, but I wanted to get the reaction from the IESG. Stay tuned.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email