Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 27 January 2016 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B9E1B2BC7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:47:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deTxI39bbNuj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A121B2BC6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9E9BE32; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:47:28 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3BEbbme9pr1; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:47:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.91] (unknown [86.46.16.108]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BD26BDCC; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:47:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1453931247; bh=pTF8vPoj8xzu4bDTq1n92LivyA11NrQWfHxGVcpnC8U=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Axcieh2yKrdtwSwzsiPcduI9wSGsLVDHD77tK7z25BKPZuOIEr3aEIeY8Pw1HgDu0 3pS7+ZAqrv90/AwzYRiWATgWOOvc+1g1+1nlHeLo3koQ9VmqO/u4EhgkOtgsmFc9rS UyUsVfe5Ty9EOwzadgypamX2XT2DXboaPeC/DMpY=
Subject: Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160125231333.27786.50459.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56A897AE.9060900@alvestrand.no> <C2338AA69B074ACA5E89DFD4@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56A91DFC.70105@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56A93AEA.2080304@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:47:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56A91DFC.70105@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x1oxZpJ7dm6ZJO1knzs1QJQLbG0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:47:31 -0000


On 27/01/16 19:43, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> There is in fact considerable IESG discussion logged at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt/history/
> which I found from the link given in the IESG message.

Actually, if people do find that sufficiently enlightening
or find it generates more questions, it'd be good to let
the IESG know eithr way, in case we miss stuff in crafting
a response (or to save us confusing matters more by trying
to clarify by adding words:-).

When I scanned the history, I think it did more or less
cover what I recall of the discussions (though that's easier
for me of course since I was part of 'em). The only missing
bit of info is that the IESG and ISE have arranged to have a
chat about all of our expectations for "returning items and
5742 review." We've had a couple of those recently, (one
that was easy-peasy and then this one:-), and people were a
bit confused about the right way to handle stuff. That chat
is planned to happen @ IETF95.

Cheers,
S.