IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re:

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 30 June 2017 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FBB13144D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7hfowzD37Ok for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CB3131448 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id h64so27676851iod.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XLk9hHUxxGdvKvtynMGFaX5Q/kle8hFo5AHMe8ilDw0=; b=iSer6OkxQgCcVS342cP+Tc/6QwQ1HkAjbDuN1MvCLQ6nxiRFh4qhFvPiISG+7caQ+H KQuV309fSrSFKuEQcjSJIs6uazmqSXvh8Unstq1x2E9JczIZI0yO94OJ8mwvmwV6Hem3 71DMB55wMISEbHGX5h5pH3Jt70jAo2zsP382rV2cX3giZPzqhEVsRo/tpRRoLKUqnkaq /l63EJKDfahWovTT5ekEXrDfsjjPbhzjU2BB3VFhP5mvTr0gohq2MjOakjzUltGnwKwC VkMIQTsA69bxzJFiof8emJcE4wpt+O2TCkEWnLq8dt7mVKHMjwUfpzMLn9mv5ApkQRFO EenA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XLk9hHUxxGdvKvtynMGFaX5Q/kle8hFo5AHMe8ilDw0=; b=eIUX/pTcN1wYQfDnFF3PUwsAq0EV2DRcATuz55aKhP0iUD9RS+iMXrSp1H17Vb/ucn QV1mHtxma/sJ0VmbM0ovy0Fgqt6sqHLNwN16ZLjNc+O/T4Ah1Q6TTsy0JgPfZOueBsmx bGY/FnqX4VQgz6s7/ACTbsivRAb2TigKrICSJbS+QevvCed0VyeU/bJDKKgIlwbSYJ+M VeOh84ZNK7Y084mpNX1f1F+r1Cd5EpoCxF6ksOmS3IlmSA39pvRYsw3pOS2J/K2mmkzB gS3AnqyiyOnTwwp+9rKa/LY3HtWbruO/II3UaW7Lrs+qVt3CCKLIdPY44gen2gda+6Fv yPYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyGqJJ5TvJU+qzhHTdopHXbBxwoogchcjEVCKKAIkBRLvm5WRih Mrf+fzf3fEpfD7vhZd03dpxvR5haOQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.4.19 with SMTP id 19mr22521114ioe.95.1498843306922; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.17.221 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bd508ec0-a532-cd65-2b51-4dbd8f36de1c@ripe.net>
References: <51541b4b-a58a-9430-9426-5486edbc1540@gih.com> <CA3EDEF73364C49363D0CD89@PSB> <bd508ec0-a532-cd65-2b51-4dbd8f36de1c@ripe.net>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:21:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEE5+nF_biteqsbEThU8tSeN7SwuCZLun3MHuJYVGvn0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re:
To: Daniel Karrenberg <dfk@ripe.net>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IpbZF8dKT4BzuZkVlrFIA7tF1uw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:21:49 -0000

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk@ripe.net> wrote:
> john,
>
> ...
>
> Conversely it would be problematic now to have three letter ASCII ccTLDs
> unless there is a clear agreement with ISO that they will never allocate
> a three letter code that already exists as a gTLD. Afaik there are no
> clashes right now, but past results are not a guarantee for the future.

COM is the three letter code for the Comoros Islands. I believe it is
also used by a few entities as their TLD :-)

> It is never a good idea to have two 'authorities' over one part of a
> name space.
>
> dfk

Thanks,
Donald

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email