Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 29 August 2013 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8AC21F9EF4; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cd8bq78UQHAW; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EAE21F9F19; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4382CC54; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:59:07 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIAn2P32oVi9; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:59:06 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A9B2CC50; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:59:06 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CE1EC68E.5B19%peter@akayla.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:59:06 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <65B21C40-435C-45DB-8E64-CEE73E728037@piuha.net>
References: <CE1EC68E.5B19%peter@akayla.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery.all@tools.ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:59:24 -0000

Peter: Thank you very much for your review. 

Based on this review and my own review, I am recommending the approval of this draft in today's telechat. (Note that other ADs have raised a number of other issues, some of which I agree with, but I did not want to repeat their comments.)

Jari

On Jul 31, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: Jul-31-2013
> IETF LC End Date: Jul-31-2013
> IESG Telechat date: TBD
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> should be fixed before publication. [Ready with nits.]
> 
> The draft describes a means by which Devices behind a residential gateway
> may discover the correct Location Information Server on the access network
> providing Internet access to residential gateway.  The Device may thereby
> gain access to certain location-based services.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Section 1, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: should "data" be appended
> after "location"?  The wording is otherwise odd.
> 
> Page 7, 3rd paragraph: change "which" to "that".
> 
> Page 9, section 4.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: I'll admit my ignorance
> of the finer points of the DNS and inquire what this sentence is supposed
> to mean.  To what are the additional domain names added and how does this
> allow a DNS record to cover a larger set of addresses?  Perhaps it's just
> the wording or my lack of knowledge, but I didn't follow this point fully.
> 
> Page 9, section 4.2, 2nd bullet item: change "sucessively" to
> "successively".
> 
> Page 11, section 4.6, 1st paragraph, 4th sentence: insert "a" before
> "STUN server" or change "server" to "servers" depending on how many
> need to be configured.
> 
> Page 12, 1st sentence: delete "a".
> 
> Page 12, 1st sentence: What about /56 for IPv6?
> 
> Page 14, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete "a" before
> "IP addresses" or change "addresses" to "address" depending on
> how many false addresses you mean.
> 
> Page 14, 6th paragraph, last sentence: Are there any concrete
> suggestions on who a device might determine accuracy?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art