Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 05 September 2013 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4A211E81A8; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBzzHEQZ8-hi; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155211E80EA; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t60so1114530wes.8 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3aEbB/ms6n8k+Iz+v22u2h50iqAGm/LWnJdXYs6dz3c=; b=Gin+TAuTan/CBUbiw+hbbwBj2mUw8nVzkAVnoPzzeUeCB3Q9sNq27IT2w7dLMUpXjS 9Quclx2mQxw5FG8VoCV/1O9kDFMjHO/GwOox8ZR3iy5MppJMrNrNtiTNemyBkK9dTjIC 7sKhS8ml7QM7QFXy83fUeTqk4Vn41xIeSc6J31YC0NSkFFfFmFO2LuByN1BZ0eQgOiPI 4XAMPcA1kz5cDr1xBSJsaZLgxxSUggRhNuY/dbWGTQomNKaihuvKyPjr6PUDZgfalSPY 5Tolt/AgsuEXP1v4AWP5VNZQSs9NHKWS+eCBUbgiWjtp23DYLWA0jK6XD3t7hrTnV7Qe NjTg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.10 with SMTP id ho10mr7938245wib.14.1378418200791; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE1EC68E.5B19%peter@akayla.com>
References: <CE1EC68E.5B19%peter@akayla.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:56:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXrTQfvwCn0RXXPGOprw6qrS2Vdrv6Ge=QA=SvGsW_eMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery.all@tools.ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:56:46 -0000
Thanks Peter. I fixed all the nits: https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/commit/0e7cc6089e96f6b4b2a2cff0d094733b313b8e39 On 31 July 2013 13:50, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote: > Page 9, section 4.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: I'll admit my ignorance > of the finer points of the DNS and inquire what this sentence is supposed > to mean. To what are the additional domain names added and how does this > allow a DNS record to cover a larger set of addresses? Perhaps it's just > the wording or my lack of knowledge, but I didn't follow this point fully. This relates to the label shortening. In the reverse tree, an IP address is represented as a series of labels in reverse order. Fewer labels means that the resulting name covers a specific prefix (each label is 8 bits for v4, 4 bits for v6). I've added an example to this section that I hope helps demonstrate this. https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/commit/29a4c98deaa1c9f9be66633e7bdfc7fd971318e9 > Page 14, 6th paragraph, last sentence: Are there any concrete > suggestions on who a device might determine accuracy? An independent, trusted source of location information could aid in verification, even in the trusted source is unable to provide information with the same accuracy as the discovered LIS.