IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B734120108 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lKzWcmK3LFJ7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A325A12004C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.172.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x9P7mTYj006270 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1571989722; x=1572076122; i=@elandsys.com; bh=z1BSRX2VjWk6aVfzG/hLDYDCSStwCE+oANI3jlygPO8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=dQpq93cf95PYRr3mT/uvhAZnwJiPrfH1oCGOTs4T0PBKczvIXAZ5H00YykMU7Io4y cMu967yE2DpvVSeXH9G0FC2iUi86Yv3w09pa2ge4ZRWoIfRzVzo/NkrJmZP0hwlKWg N2s4ebH0pI8bJ9dgANvhYDHLeIG+zMjE5CQlQ7E4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20191025000022.0d4d5570@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:47:56 -0700
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KHNfDkTxIn_oKtGw1aNluFZIZFw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:48:46 -0000

Dear Ms Kuehlewind,

There is the following sentence in Mr Klensin's email: "The IETF has 
a rather long and difficult history, with only a few exceptions since 
the POISED and POISSON WGs, of there being two types of process 
change proposals".  Is that incorrect?

There is also the following sentence: "They, and especially ones that 
members of the IESG see as a threat to their authority or the way 
they do things and sometimes as adding work, have tended to 
vanish".  Is the IESG the final authority for all standards decisions?

The term "members of the community" is mentioned in your reply.  What 
does a person have to do become a member of the community?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email