Re: HTML email

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB93A0141 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvvcDrS6HIM3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com (mail-yb1-f172.google.com [209.85.219.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8A93A011B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id k65so2406448ybk.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y6xpjMPTjVkhVZGB2CM8fJRzluAKqsy83amHHRNolSM=; b=In4Aj2p9mNBHtvLR+RJBsLr4qdMAYTlBfShhF6HQ9xDfHl9yNfcC+EAnE6sDBBmVc7 c58QFwKl2F0fA4b0Uo4b70U3GZUhKGulsz6EMhMBoW0B+bidnoCt+sJPVf732b/G9XvK oCJbkup4NHWQuXxez2Pk0NtNuNDMGu6nw4886TOfrPbSK8efxr5L3Yxx22ZOzOjX8H0T IYQTmEA1uIcW4r0vIIQVru2rxEoKjUZRsRhPwJAnCaCxFhvvBcBntU5+n5Ak+Hz0X56r kbVZInVHyZyNDnEiADeEf3hU2PeJSbCgGcDz3sN7J3vkWN32ozMyGvHmJA6S4uCcs13W wpRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OhLnLoYbTyk1AI4i0ierG78Gt92c1Mm4vACRXZwXn3+PAypOV x0g9SNX2c00CWr1XjIHGk9o3rfAestqdKx3U9/ASyrJU56qsog==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrH1qSJXal3dtnAo7YqwwHsqJ03DonY+AjvtzSgcRAEfQc7B8nj2NZ0UkrGGGv7YycRGrVqWtBK1LgGHGv8+g=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e00b:: with SMTP id x11mr25949387ybg.518.1605111031831; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1402442110.9123.1605109363219@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1402442110.9123.1605109363219@email.ionos.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:10:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwga13MwgMzgn1_cG9-pv4337_GiqJOz0ZXCVtOQHN=-8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HTML email
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e0a0f405b3d70883"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KHdCxChLaqDNV0yQQjc35vFEtxQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:10:34 -0000

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:43 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
wrote:

> Well it looks like all my previous emails are in markup.  I guess I will
> have to reload every single email in its text version.
>

When Nathaniel Borenstein originally proposed MIME, he tried to persuade
people to adopt a rich text markup. That failed and he was criticized for
it, but he was right.

HTML/2.0 would have been an excellent basis for rich text markup. It
provides essentially the same capabilities Nathaniel proposed which are
similar to those supported by Gmail and Medium and Markdown.

Today's HTML is not a structured markup. It has been turned into a
presentation markup, not a structured markup. And it really doesn't work at
all well. Responding to messages in the wrong client can result in
ludicrously tiny or huge text.