IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DMARC methods in mailman (off-topic)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 22 December 2016 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4842129571 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=xxDXYG7w; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=VlzfNm4e
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAKcP3QCAqMZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58211279EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBMMpJRh007018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:51:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1482447086; x=1482533486; bh=RcIYPmKampbpUNk/deMiltv6fDctOEj2hjriyzflqEo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=xxDXYG7wX429nAd1ijS3vbpoSk+zahhQ98sw2/6BFb4Q36CJ/qJjSK7Whgjp1+1ZK 3p5To/K1LRQ3exXdYRl4u7r+JzCLDJAY2wNxiAnp07RpBypoKVA36eHe4YeLSYkXFJ f+KAYbSQjqAjJ2Zp14XSZ+CdE/e5/l9YwPLisq+Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1482447086; x=1482533486; i=@elandsys.com; bh=RcIYPmKampbpUNk/deMiltv6fDctOEj2hjriyzflqEo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VlzfNm4e8FWlWLAfCTX/RNfoIgkqe67S8AGCZBTKiGFRuEg8WBguOEff5RMhiRKMV G4jINuW/SAFJPqKKN3+KRztAylegFUe4BMoiItNY0c91MrHrcfozg4T3ap08Gw58sm YN/lfLgtfvwO3RCNmbvCmybcZ/MFXSB56qtIn8N4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20161222140544.0c9712b8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:46:28 -0800
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: DMARC methods in mailman (off-topic)
In-Reply-To: <585C41A4.6030008@isdg.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20161222061125.0adacfa0@elandsys.com> <585C41A4.6030008@isdg.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KJqDtfSlOIwDoQrhplgctLaGwkQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:51:28 -0000

Hi Hector,
At 13:12 22-12-2016, Hector Santos wrote:
>Is that the new modus operandi within the IETF, that extremely weak, 
>poorly engineered Informational Docs can be fast tracked as a 
>"standard" in the IETF?

The way to publish an IETF Proposed Standard or IETF Informational 
document has been the same for over a decade.  I don't think that the 
IETF has changed its way of doing that.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email