IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679C521F875F; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VLDsroJUQVB; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25D521F874E; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-CheckPoint: {4E157CB0-9-1B221DC2-FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p678VX5Z026200; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:31:33 +0300
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:30:08 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "'mrex@sap.com'" <mrex@sap.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:30:06 +0300
Subject: RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
Thread-Index: Acw8HoFNI9mcKA6JSjSLaIL3Nj9C1wAYXRcA
Message-ID: <006FEB08D9C6444AB014105C9AEB133F01714C077305@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <4E14C31E.4010603@dougbarton.us> from "Doug Barton" at Jul 6, 11 01:18:38 pm <201107062049.p66Knlfi026308@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <201107062049.p66Knlfi026308@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:31:46 -0000

Extremist-A should be to publish a "6to4 considered dangerous" draft with lots of MUST NOT language.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Rex
Sent: 06 July 2011 23:50
To: Doug Barton
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

Doug Barton wrote:
> 
> On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
> >
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > >
> > > I was however willing to accept "historic" as a reasonable compromise.
> >
> > "historic" as a compromise?  Between which two positions?
> 
> Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor?

Which to options that are actually available to the IESG?  I see

extremist-A:  nuke/kill 6to4 by moving 3056/3068 to historic

compromise:   move 3056/3068 off Standards Track,
              i.e. by reclassifying them as Experimental

blocked:      leave 3056/3068 at Proposed, publish only 6to4-advisory

extremist-B:  stick fingers in ears, sing la-la-la, pretend 6to4 is perfect


-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email