Nomcom Reports

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 04 March 2013 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1821F909D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:31:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVS7VfBZ4+Vz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC9121F909C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b40so946613qcq.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:31:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vBHlszEIvRUvmCUFEk5ZCzOyCoP9ZRAIBDzkdvlYIeI=; b=iQlrFSdjA0KUXd4GPHM0I0Eu23kjOzVcfNs1h53k4huBumdKTB9UxhccdJYvPNO3n+ 5mk23Q+yfZA8V8Qu4MDGb8cc65UjGfMFRuG4i0qu35A2+UQlrOwnyGzLVO5DCZhFRyV0 V6srnTOhnWzwIbO1nNnO43EW4FeYs+tIJ9lGhS8bfS1Qu4NpFPGRQrq95QndQ4hq/omr v7xH1lG1+Z2UwRKbpkVzOfR9TBxnZkaWvUuW0HjquzoBvv1KDJUT6mhcAkZMbVUXfXCY nn0H2sJOxTwjrdmSrmnKfI3hQFvCTiA7KqPT/5rRCeglNu+k/4M7wNE6p0jriy+UPD5F ALEQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.202.132 with SMTP id fe4mr7766400qcb.14.1362429079621; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.24.130 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:31:19 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4AFChBF_WYYQwor0W-3jLBJey4KTK3fMSSGRWUALGJcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Nomcom Reports
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:31:21 -0000

As far as I can tell, the last official Nomcom report was from the
Nomcom I chaired (2009-2010):
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00.txt

I have a general question for the community as to whether they find
such reports useful and whether we should encourage future nomcom
chairs to produce these?  While this is not listed as a requirement in
RFC 3777, I had understood as chair that this was a requirement for
the job, but again, I've not seen that carried on.  Personally, I
don't find a few .ppt charts adequate in terms of summarizing the
outcome of such an important IETF process.   The Nomcom gains a unique
insight into the operation of the IETF (and its leadership) that no
one else gets.

I will note that of the 4 issues that I raised in the report, there
are 2 that remain critical IMHO:
- Section 7.1   Diversity.  Out of the leaders across the IAOC, IAB
and IESG, there is one individual from Asia and one female (both on
the IAB).

- Section 7.3.  Expertise.  Of course, this is directly related to the
long thread of discussion underway with regards to filling the
Transport AD position - i.e., it's the exact same situation faced by
the 2009-2010 Nomcom.

The other two issues are of course, important, but didn't appear to be
such an issue for this year's Nomcom.

Regards,
Mary.