IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nomcom Reports

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961A411E80B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:41:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EKPByYooDsvd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09B211E80A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:41:22 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r25AfLE3017992; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:41:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r25AedKm020799; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:40:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5135CBA6.5050002@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:40:38 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Subject: Re: Nomcom Reports
References: <CAHBDyN4AFChBF_WYYQwor0W-3jLBJey4KTK3fMSSGRWUALGJcA@mail.gmail.com> <5135330C.4040501@wonderhamster.org>
In-Reply-To: <5135330C.4040501@wonderhamster.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:41:23 -0000

On 5/03/2013 00:49, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> On 3/4/2013 2:31 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, the last official Nomcom report was from the
>> Nomcom I chaired (2009-2010):
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00.txt
>>
>> I have a general question for the community as to whether they find
>> such reports useful and whether we should encourage future nomcom
>> chairs to produce these?  While this is not listed as a requirement in
>> RFC 3777, I had understood as chair that this was a requirement for
>> the job, but again, I've not seen that carried on.  Personally, I
>> don't find a few .ppt charts adequate in terms of summarizing the
>> outcome of such an important IETF process.   The Nomcom gains a unique
>> insight into the operation of the IETF (and its leadership) that no
>> one else gets.
>
> Mary, I found your report useful, especially when I served as the IAB 
> liaison to the Nomcom the following year.
>
> I would like to see reports like yours in the future.
+1

Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email