Re: Hotel Information for Minneapolis Meeting

Ted Lemon <mellon@hoffman.vix.com> Sat, 09 January 1999 02:10 UTC

Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id VAA21858 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 21:10:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.188.25]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id VAA21820 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 21:01:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from grosse.fugue.com (mellon.dialup.access.net [166.84.197.75]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.8.8/8.6.11) with ESMTP id SAA26294; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 18:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grosse.fugue.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosse.fugue.com (8.8.8/8.6.11) with ESMTP id UAA02883; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 20:58:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199901090158.UAA02883@grosse.fugue.com>
To: Tony Hain <tonyhain@microsoft.com>
cc: "M. T. Hollinger" <myth@ucx.lkg.dec.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Hotel Information for Minneapolis Meeting
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jan 1999 16:52:04 PST." <61AC5C9A4B9CD11181A200805F57CD540BFA6D23@RED-MSG-44>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:58:17 -0500
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@hoffman.vix.com>

> As a general rule I would argue that the announcement should be hidden
> behind the registration process. While I understand everyone wants to block
> a room ASAP, and it is hard to know that authorization will come through 4
> mths ahead of time, the mass cancellations that happened in Orlando just
> make it hard for those that missed the initial signup window. It makes no
> sense to have 1/3 of the primary hotel empty with people driving up to 15
> miles. If you were presented with the information after registration, those
> signing up early would have first shot at the hotel, rather than those that
> just troll the web page. 

I think this is an excellent plan, although I wonder how long the
choice of venue would remain secret.  If I'd known that 1/3 of the
primary hotel was empty, I would have switched over there.  Sigh.
So when can we start registering?

			       _MelloN_