RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 01:19 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558B91321DF; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUgA6EgLNaMn; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F303132031; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQN35746; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:19:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 02:19:06 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.199]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:19:00 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Carlos Martinez <carlosm3011@gmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
Thread-Index: AQHTQ4OATdOfpDb200e9IYEdVWzRD6Lg+0FA
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:19:00 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9ABAE890@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <150783101334.16715.10431920570121072234@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150783101334.16715.10431920570121072234@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.163]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.59E0148B.0053, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.199, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: aa7dffee95168db856f6d5d0e36d7fec
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LcZtxynx-tUI5DPuNIuk48gsR_o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:19:10 -0000
Thanks Carlos, we will. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Carlos Martinez [mailto:carlosm3011@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2017年10月13日 1:57 收件人: ops-dir@ietf.org 抄送: ietf@ietf.org; draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis.all@ietf.org 主题: Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05 Reviewer: Carlos Martinez Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. With the caveat that I'm not an expert, I've found this document to be READY. I have found it well-written (those parts that require actual prose) and adequately referenced since it relies heavily on other documents. Authors, please do remember to remove all non-final text before re-sending. Thanks! /Carlos