IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 29 August 2013 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD26421F933B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85aqxg7A8qlK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0018221F9C52 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TG8Y2o021339; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377792526; bh=v1a3BQCSoeqP7GKnPrxL9HJ0lBQFCVgrgSaE01P+s1k=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=NXvt1gpNPGcPJsYQipzcma0nn4FUOvYoY7tMpeFHBSPYR7Sg4WyahwwWEzjehTF89 AWwkNV1jJbfwLO1LUIUx9NJQLkNzY3tAgjQWQvdEa3uX4FXXj00F2aa06gsQvCRfJQ 2TTEkejwCvLhASmWQzAHDvbJH1CuspeojFu5XYYg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377792526; i=@resistor.net; bh=v1a3BQCSoeqP7GKnPrxL9HJ0lBQFCVgrgSaE01P+s1k=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=veuJRWf/fm+zTSVrPzP+/2DmCSgHLWGEh8xMSUmK6ruSesCmPzMm2d6oI+kYSUs5V mcHmYFRm/10zaoUn6prkhrcvVNaOQuCBPK+l3xINwftswlmW5B0mKa8a6Ib3/Zi/Aa CLykAZw2OCayY5abmEd4JvbPpqSZFSG8EC3oBvWI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130829085018.0cef9ea0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:57:09 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYnY6YS2W2wuK_BxQ_Fva2hSNAZ9DaNSkeFGcOXtPjvCw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130815144121.15477.78141.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815092301.0b86a398@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwZvaH-hb5eydR4HdfXcE6GPooJ57ZPfOxK3OFn1d6wqrQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130821002423.0ba0ed20@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwYnY6YS2W2wuK_BxQ_Fva2hSNAZ9DaNSkeFGcOXtPjvCw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:09:57 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 01:14 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>Ah.  I realize that CRLF is standard line termination for SMTP; is 
>it automatically the expected line termination for all line-oriented 
>protocols?  I don't know about others.

I would have to write a long answer to that question. :-)  I haven't 
had time to test what the draft specifies.  Thanks for addressing the comments.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email