IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sat, 25 February 2017 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C1C128824; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETjhsSpst_n0; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A5C1270B4; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbp-4.local (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v1PHTK6f055813 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:29:21 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209] claimed to be mbp-4.local
Subject: Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, 'IETF Agenda' <agenda@ietf.org>
References: <148797717180.3179.4164525676122298302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <005301d28f80$758d5c30$60a81490$@gmail.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <a7852494-5cd0-1777-176b-399acd6ceecd@bogus.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:29:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <005301d28f80$758d5c30$60a81490$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AQeT96oijDX3pLgx7oJ6hU7i5bSvBTJkM"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NEm10tzCjOmK4HPMGNyBYW0m0eY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:29:24 -0000

On 2/25/17 8:01 AM, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
> Dear Agenda Experts,
>
> I would like to ask to avoid an overlapping of nmrg with OPS area WGs.
> Thank you for your consideration.
I go to rather a lot of ops area working groups and I'm dubious the NMRG
colliades will all of them.

excessive collision lists just make scheduling harder.

joel
> Regards,
> Mehmet
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> IETF Agenda
>> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:00 AM
>> To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
>> Cc: 98all@ietf.org
>> Subject: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
>>
>> The IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda has been posted. The final agenda will be
>> published on Friday, March 3, 2017.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda.html
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda.txt
>>
>>
>> More information regarding IETF 98 in Chicago is located here:
>> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/98/index.html
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> IETF Secretariat
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email