IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda

"Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com> Sat, 25 February 2017 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C6A12A12A; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKvo98TDf_i7; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0DA612A126; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v77so33972453wmv.1; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language:disposition-notification-to; bh=0lbkYk7jPAXyODVDIVCzB0DInFPu0xxLd2gHptUlS3o=; b=QvBjjMpRktAa8ksQAQnSW11NEpfbpAFApjoVsEjL/VIuygjLzP/yGmSE73P9i5y80U ArWLzZIVuRkJw404g83twXPpqqERgBW5Y/Pd+SGYyEt6kxL52gzsQt9wCJCicEMOPhlp W8kdT+WbPp3BYveTSkjfyoNyGYeP1VKLHT1ZAPW01YodFRyDuvqaZlaTgCErrB2GmSzQ iCE+bR1lbbpmyxaIyr1AwcfkfgrC4IhtDhCI0x1F170wzy9EHUoQryOFKYpeuKoyEw9X TblRZEkEel6Vb47ffEdklM1pCkBWkkdvQt9Ht7imeCoUEcYD7801H1UQaY/kt9xTIGaC ggrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language:disposition-notification-to; bh=0lbkYk7jPAXyODVDIVCzB0DInFPu0xxLd2gHptUlS3o=; b=j3A1xpUTYMwV5Fezxu2KXuMU29j08J+du/D71lwMmOpiJe3IFHc4LVVQRWMl8HUgwi LV9cYo+zVoPCcpwsm//i7B0jz6A74FoDLa2tIBfRb6AYiB1mN28Bh/kcTq/hV0f0GY7U OvGNCmg68Pneu6XIHPcm3St8knh8u2z9EM1VHFFsMHxbSvf3Hw6hYjKOm3pDEEJOlRQa TSs7upj1XDge7fhVmY0zQks0NEwWAf0j+YOYBzl/Cq5cSw0Q2tJJ6UcuJlBp7I1hDj1h nPtilsN7M1Pbp8Ev3Bbg/6P8Wbt5V3GXUkXNrRDEp+nHJjGwPq3aEPSifDU1Vr6Yyj+u ZtFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mhE4/xYdnLcuJ9r6SLHYJ9HsB6FpsCUU1SKpAjWiwJWhPJbbqCtMiMnSM4e70HqQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.165.196 with SMTP id o187mr6752030wme.6.1488038499965; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ (p5DCC6FAD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.204.111.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a35sm14877788wra.21.2017.02.25.08.01.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:01:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
To: 'IETF Agenda' <agenda@ietf.org>
References: <148797717180.3179.4164525676122298302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148797717180.3179.4164525676122298302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:01:43 +0100
Message-ID: <005301d28f80$758d5c30$60a81490$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQLvBlHc5cYfAkTApDxLlwOHz1YA3p9A8+Aw
Content-Language: de
X-AVK-Virus-Check: AVA 25.10096;BF82DA0
X-AVK-Spam-Check: 1; str=0001.0A0C0204.58B1AA63.0068,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0; AE713
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/o3GcCkas6Gns8fdVF2llZN8RIG0>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:01:43 -0000

Dear Agenda Experts,

I would like to ask to avoid an overlapping of nmrg with OPS area WGs.
Thank you for your consideration.

Regards,
Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> IETF Agenda
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:00 AM
> To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: 98all@ietf.org
> Subject: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
> 
> The IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda has been posted. The final agenda will be
> published on Friday, March 3, 2017.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda.html
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda.txt
> 
> 
> More information regarding IETF 98 in Chicago is located here:
> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/98/index.html
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email