Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 09 August 2026 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE26126A1D70; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1786291834; bh=5Q+gEUqw7vrCfIuhO1TlVedp4a+XNH01PmdBDoX405M=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=kOq9qhL8HzIAmzuA69mRQM+n+/PUg6yitGqXeYPqZR4/ExeyYVMF/yp3KTZi05qYe KK3mpdcmE0h5EtLypet724yEYbRYNHB70HukJkqdKcWbP0KfnI1Em4Lw731Ub7h7TW WS+s2VJ2NDAbc8ot8mJ5trU+CRPHI2Qv+P0iHse4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yTecGLkq0px; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E72126A1D5E; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=JcK-HP5) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1wt66a-000HeQ-BO; Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:10:32 -0400
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:10:32 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
Message-ID: <0DCE87A05F0F6391B9DB7219@JcK-HP5>
In-Reply-To: <CAD499eKy89UmFNrnSX5rmoCwBiiaDuVhojJQ+fXVFUtAmNf8zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9BC576A20221A4094704F309@PSB> <950516DB-371F-4678-8907-19E68A282CAF@foobar.org> <AFA0585BCCA202087CDB3CEB@PSB> <CAD499eKy89UmFNrnSX5rmoCwBiiaDuVhojJQ+fXVFUtAmNf8zQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: YUBR7S76TY3HBUZDP7FUPW52Y4ILZZ67
X-Message-ID-Hash: YUBR7S76TY3HBUZDP7FUPW52Y4ILZZ67
X-MailFrom: john-ietf@jck.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OjiaaBdXg3LH8dsYoc-A0_sXhyM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Sure, Corinne. I suppose that makes a case for Esperanto on the grounds that it would probably discriminate equally against almost everyone in this community, is no one's first language, and is relatively easy to learn. We could, of course, set considerations about a better Internet aside while people who wanted to contribute to the IETF learned it and should not worry about anyone who, rather than learn it, dropped out. And, of course, anyone who thought reading and understanding RFCs (and any other IETF work) would need to learn it too... and would immediately do that rather than moving on. Did you have a better plan in mind? john --On Sunday, 09 August, 2026 09:23 +0200 Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> wrote: > Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the > imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? — > and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p >
- British or American spelling in IETF docs jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Nick Hilliard
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Corinne Cath
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Christian Huitema
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Dan Harkins
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Jay Daley
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John Levine
- RPC tasks (was Re: British or American spelling i… Jean Mahoney
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Jean Mahoney
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs S Moonesamy
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Jim Reid
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs lloydwood@users.sourceforge.net
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Ken Kubota
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs S Moonesamy
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs S Moonesamy
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Greg Skinner
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John Levine
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs S Moonesamy
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Job Snijders
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Michael Richardson
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Jean Mahoney
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Nick Hilliard
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Bob Hinden
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Thomas Howe
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Watson Ladd
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Narelle Clark
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs David Lake
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Vittorio Bertola
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Nick Hilliard
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Ben Yalow
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John R Levine
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John Levine
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs John C Klensin
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Rob Sayre
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Rob Sayre
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Rob Sayre
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Salz, Rich
- Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs Rob Sayre