Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 09 August 2026 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE26126A1D70; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1786291834; bh=5Q+gEUqw7vrCfIuhO1TlVedp4a+XNH01PmdBDoX405M=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=kOq9qhL8HzIAmzuA69mRQM+n+/PUg6yitGqXeYPqZR4/ExeyYVMF/yp3KTZi05qYe KK3mpdcmE0h5EtLypet724yEYbRYNHB70HukJkqdKcWbP0KfnI1Em4Lw731Ub7h7TW WS+s2VJ2NDAbc8ot8mJ5trU+CRPHI2Qv+P0iHse4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yTecGLkq0px; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E72126A1D5E; Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=JcK-HP5) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1wt66a-000HeQ-BO; Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:10:32 -0400
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:10:32 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
Message-ID: <0DCE87A05F0F6391B9DB7219@JcK-HP5>
In-Reply-To: <CAD499eKy89UmFNrnSX5rmoCwBiiaDuVhojJQ+fXVFUtAmNf8zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9BC576A20221A4094704F309@PSB> <950516DB-371F-4678-8907-19E68A282CAF@foobar.org> <AFA0585BCCA202087CDB3CEB@PSB> <CAD499eKy89UmFNrnSX5rmoCwBiiaDuVhojJQ+fXVFUtAmNf8zQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: YUBR7S76TY3HBUZDP7FUPW52Y4ILZZ67
X-Message-ID-Hash: YUBR7S76TY3HBUZDP7FUPW52Y4ILZZ67
X-MailFrom: john-ietf@jck.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OjiaaBdXg3LH8dsYoc-A0_sXhyM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

Sure, Corinne.  I suppose that makes a case for Esperanto on the
grounds that it would probably discriminate equally against
almost everyone in this community, is no one's first language,
and is relatively easy to learn.  We could, of course, set
considerations about a better Internet aside while people who
wanted to contribute to the IETF learned it and should not worry
about anyone who, rather than learn it, dropped out.  And, of
course, anyone who thought reading and understanding RFCs (and
any other IETF work) would need to learn it too... and would
immediately do that rather than moving on.  

Did you have a better plan in mind?

   john


--On Sunday, 09 August, 2026 09:23 +0200 Corinne Cath
<corinnecath@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the
> imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? —
> and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p
>