Re: [consensus] comments on draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 05 April 2007 18:55 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZX7E-00030D-VD; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:55:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZX7D-0002y4-4E for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:55:23 -0400
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZX7B-0003Si-ES for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:55:22 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 495B7E0433; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
References: <41825.12.108.168.179.1171660575.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <tslwt2hiybm.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <C24CB51D5AA800449982D9BCB90325134F192B@NAEX13.na.qualcomm.com> <tslfy947pol.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <45D73CEB.2000701@qualcomm.com> <C24CB51D5AA800449982D9BCB90325134F192D@NAEX13.na.qualcomm.com> <0C7B902B470A264FA64D66CBF76FB821014CD3F6@WIN-MSG-20.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <C24CB51D5AA800449982D9BCB90325134F1947@NAEX13.na.qualcomm.com> <tsld52qipph.fsf_-_@cz.mit.edu> <52310.69.12.173.8.1175549276.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <tsl7ist2dif.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <14965.12.108.168.179.1175731583.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <tsltzvvei2w.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <55127.69.12.173.8.1175796056.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:55:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <55127.69.12.173.8.1175796056.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> (Dan Harkins's message of "Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:00:56 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <tsl3b3e3b3e.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba <bernarda@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [consensus] comments on draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Dan, I'd appreciate it if you could work with Russ and Bernard on
seeing f the draft has adequate text to cover the issues that I think
we now agree should be covered.  My approach would be to clarify the
definition of session key to clearly include MSK and handoff keys that
fill the same role.  (session key is broader than TSK or TEK) and to
clarify what key scope needs to include.

Other approaches are also possible and I am not attached to my
proposal.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf