IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OCSP Stapling

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Mon, 22 August 2016 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BA612D5BF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samwhited.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l9IlUJPnHTly for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81DD312D549 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t7so88155699qkh.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; s=swgoo; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/Of+U9fJM+TyXQ/aJObhHRnI/nhhflsDPrPczFVRvI=; b=BMdIvO3wpLmtdR1MrTUMg84Hefs8XOuP8F2fYHsQkg3zU2le2RuJtVaJcREAeVgglf Ur9WmbSPWzSL7FL6ziP8Uyd4FS5++h5w7CT7hn0HwhJ8pZW11QVOqNOCnymylJ65kJ8f bOqZoqDwwUo9JznrpSvy4y0fX5fhu/+NriQ4Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/Of+U9fJM+TyXQ/aJObhHRnI/nhhflsDPrPczFVRvI=; b=SxSdqjwpPSQIS9c6igVZuIuI9WHM3R5LBtlCXz0OwfHgzYqjuJzJFUhU5iStJbWkgo mQ4O0okAAxK2grtoarl3rif1rtQG7GqmlB/1hgpTfkdUixYvVVHUsyVUgWTOqlQ15xi1 q4DxyJPLU3kf6SRTbOerV0UrdECxIdojvKLaTtdrz4WI6EFHv4lopCbdrUpAFoAe0D1f 0vISX9OLCZ1SG+KrH68Kj3yau7WHqb0sgEHwDbtKYAi8JKuvz+EQ9kg91lk5LQfkuiY8 ciW79+CVXB8sUX0MOKF6TWc7AocnHmz0h4apq2tzAxyJcGLE+7xvJgy989iYNeq4Eo6C Tu6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousdJ7TrdHP5cqVQkJFzCdVvauhLrjR9UzCcMnl/W96/Kbl3bWn0ap6xb/qu7FUQrsGdRUPTnDMNClgW8w==
X-Received: by 10.55.31.21 with SMTP id f21mr26881625qkf.254.1471886794530; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.51.70 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [72.48.156.244]
In-Reply-To: <CABL0ig5pnV+SJG=+=s5YD1sw6pmfu2CKFr0XVUhYEeJst5a_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABL0ig54RAvDGoqJN+YuQWk1unkYuiQLExF4Guo8LXYQKpsg2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbk4RLjW6as8jN7CPnhqqGj=Fnw4waGeUnPLDExvsg=ZjXNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABL0ig5pnV+SJG=+=s5YD1sw6pmfu2CKFr0XVUhYEeJst5a_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:25:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbk4RL_MtXWQnPwfsWRyi6YWxBWML_ZAWxSUMUYtsxXnerOFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OCSP Stapling
To: glen@amsl.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RUXvgKmxV8_qSrJoAL6v1lVX_Zk>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, ietf-action@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:26:37 -0000

Glen,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Glen <glen@amsl.com> wrote:
> This was done as announced and scheduled, and appears to be configured
> and working properly, both on our server directly, and through
> CloudFlare.  Various tests I've run seem to confirm that OCSP Stapling
> is completed.
>
> If anyone continues to have trouble, please contact us at
> ietf-action@ietf.org, or reach out to me directly, and we'll do
> whatever we can to assist.

I'm still not seeing this; was it also enabled for tools.ietf.org
where the RFCs live?

$ openssl s_client -connect tools.ietf.org:443 -tls1  -tlsextdebug
-status 2>&1 | grep "OCSP response"
OCSP response: no response sent

—Sam

CCed  ietf-action@ietf.org



-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email