IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OCSP Stapling

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Mon, 22 August 2016 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1944D12D77D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samwhited.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMKeKtKgkI_D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941EF12D784 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l2so86741922qkf.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; s=swgoo; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yRfR6nAUIN9HHdzx9Bfl5v8wDlqTZRiw8LQitGnlHe4=; b=Vl09QVT5M9kEc5Jggk75BiD4J9OODcNgP6ZxkOud70rUy4uctLPN6csQXZAkaeHLMh rQFLTCgK3ve/aEDMFGCXDjrYcELYFSh62oF3pnQBSiPVP4OUiQqDcUiOfhRgrql1dOlH MA5qXkg5GpWzk5f5BTKYBSz3ihdim1od5s98c=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yRfR6nAUIN9HHdzx9Bfl5v8wDlqTZRiw8LQitGnlHe4=; b=ONsC48k+HZ+Klg1dxkt9KtzvH1DxgjGLLJErdvjcB2d/mc2kBkiJT63/jZnKzcZhIk b/kTeIG9e0+nk7d6GeB6IDT+rjOCTtKiKhoKrtSYFZOFw37UwiY8dPdFn2XsAvCy6rxd OicY6SvPDS0YkTPA/v3K6JtBhweLwtwl5z7G3Z91Tygn5OoQUgBy8coNdutIMhutHM5N S0/GlxmEgCPAcx0Co/S4XZC7o/6yx8p/Tb2sT4dUNr2KSLHJa6/BT0mN0o7Q2ImBQLpG B+nL1pxPRbVPLda/NpOfkMeugilqkz9cPZUrutplubvNW/7xb9zqR4JV9AL+tT+ilqzS rHAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv0ox0sEqSTtUCD5ojmC/c2qN9rakYeiaLmWDpalfibKBVRgSL8z119Rj4ARQdKM93SFxgbLJnlEjLiDQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.188.195 with SMTP id m186mr24374940qkf.180.1471882210633; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.51.70 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [72.48.156.244]
In-Reply-To: <CABL0ig54RAvDGoqJN+YuQWk1unkYuiQLExF4Guo8LXYQKpsg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABL0ig54RAvDGoqJN+YuQWk1unkYuiQLExF4Guo8LXYQKpsg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:09:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbk4RLjW6as8jN7CPnhqqGj=Fnw4waGeUnPLDExvsg=ZjXNBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OCSP Stapling
To: glen@amsl.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VKSmdvtleZQei3Ky2SbMXqXeA3I>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:10:22 -0000

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Glen <glen@amsl.com> wrote:
> Absent any objections to this, we will enable OCSP Stapling as
> requested later this week.

Hi Glen et al,

Original requester here:

Since there were no objections, is there any chance we can go ahead
and deploy this? I've had a few more times where the OCSP server goes
down temporarily or just has trouble handling the request.

Thanks,
Sam


-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email