IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 support in hotel contract?

Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson@gmail.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bishop.robinson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D46921F8AF4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdHR+wc+BWBx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179CE21F8AF3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnv1 with SMTP id v1so3907294ggn.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Hb24HAfR4brFL3jDlf0cv+VCGyi4iKwx0xlPaX9WxRk=; b=O+X+LZa9QfMIv994mCZg44d1Iszz1s/mX7aJGBRcBu8xqSi4AoHEgy40CZxMLGhVYY 7DZOwbuB0f1iQ7GMa7JvLx8ycWVtnL3Qahw8LXUbAzWgdZH8wPm7XQAS1p1oj0wUUStF AfIze9tZc8uMzCf2UvFPnzL0lPluGH/U1Cn54=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.72.20 with SMTP id u20mr11993667yba.57.1319150127716; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.42.18 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110201156080.19162@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791451222984@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B225CA600DD@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4EA06059.4010305@bogus.com> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD46569377914513341DA@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110201156080.19162@egate.xpasc.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:35:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CACK2x9-+8zP479XPTFEmU5CRQnyZaKgUOwwkBojzuYLGCf4ScQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 support in hotel contract?
From: Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:35:29 -0000

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:59 PM, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
> Of course, as has been mentioned many times in other threads, we
> negotiate meeting venues a long time in advance. There may even
> be an IT support plan to add IPV6 before we arrive..

I think that it's great if they say they have a plan to add IPv6
support, but plans (especially about IPv6) seem to have a weird habit
of being delayed. It seems prudent to put it in the signed contract so
that there are no surprises from either the hotel/venue side or from
the conference organizers' side.

--R

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email