IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The "nomap" Network Identifier Suffix

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E281AE030 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNeHT7VfcBos for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0AC1AE04F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpYE3ZMBAVveFtQMQSJk8dkOSHesLMtS@postini.com; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:37 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331451B82B9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60FC19005C; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:42:36 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: The "nomap" Network Identifier Suffix
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131127045226.74559.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:42:32 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B939184E-AE28-44CE-A6E5-80EDB34E32CD@nominum.com>
References: <20131127045226.74559.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: Eric Burger <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:43:01 -0000

On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:52 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> And it has the same problem as do-not-track, there's no way to tell
> whether people you don't trust are following it.

I thought the point was for it to advise network geolocation survey bots that the hotspot with this ssid is mobile and can't be used for geolocation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email