IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Slim] Last Call: <draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06.txt> (Negotiating Human Language in Real-Time Communications) to Proposed Standard

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Tue, 14 February 2017 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E7B129436 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:16:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3mRoncMbbp6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plwbeout03-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp03-03-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A558129452 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.135]) by p3plwbeout03-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id kQG81u0022vs63s01QG8tY; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:16:08 -0700
X-SID: kQG81u0022vs63s01
Received: (qmail 30421 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2017 00:16:08 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Originating-IP: 208.51.143.189
User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.6.3
Message-Id: <20170213171605.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.fce7ee4dbe.wbe@email03.godaddy.com>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>, slim@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Slim] Last Call: <draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06.txt> (Negotiating Human Language in Real-Time Communications) to Proposed Standard
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:16:05 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RuLKOr2YTlDqqSYSRRqtjqzXi2s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:16:10 -0000

Paul Kyzivat wrote:

> Gunnar's comment makes multiple points. You have highlighted one of
> them and ignored the others.

Some of Gunnar's points were excellent, such as the observation that the
terminology is inconsistent as to whether the asterisk is part of the
tag.

I did not attempt to respond to all of Gunnar's points, nor did I think
that was necessary.

> I accept the WG's decision not to address the "preference" issue. But
> this attachment to the "ugly child", if not addressed, invites getting
> IESG LC comments.

I'm not sure what this refers to, but I'm happy to refrain from further
comments on this LC if you think they might put the draft in jeopardy.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email