Protocol Action: Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6 to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Wed, 29 May 1996 16:59 UTC
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22100; 29 May 96 12:59 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10927; 29 May 96 12:58 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22073; 29 May 96 12:58 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21920; 29 May 96 12:55 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10875; 29 May 96 12:55 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21915; 29 May 96 12:55 EDT
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Sender: ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Protocol Action: Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6 to Proposed Standard
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 12:55:26 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9605291255.aa21915@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6" <draft-ietf-ipngwg-pmtuv6-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This document is the product of the IPNG Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Scott Bradner and Allison Mankin. Technical Summary This document describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6. It defines a method to determine the largest packet size that can successfully traverse the path from the source node to the destination node. The procedure is largely derived from RFC-1191, which describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 4. Since IPv6 routers do not fragment packets the use of Path MTU Discovery should be implemented in all IPv6 nodes which would like to send packets greater than the IPv6 minimum packet size (576 bytes) long. Working Group Summary The Working Group Last-Call produced no issues about the proposal. Protocol Quality This document was reviewed for the IESG by Scott Bradner and Allison Mankin.