Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
Eric Burger <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu> Fri, 26 September 2014 03:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mep27rym@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9402B1A011F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-qU8IiUhy_r for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DAC1A00B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wo20so9311354obc.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=55H4i8DcbDPZSuiI1/qHOjwnbeIbDfYs/RQ1cnc2GoY=; b=d7K/oGbBcHrjGCVpGFf0RtOSUcuzC5w4mWlJdAQQF4jjYIaqmEdzqk9mrMAAeHHPVC LBu+p4WADdfsKMHuTM7YYVpY29BsmUzCC4uSDmyTXpu1I5Fg09LzfLWJhMCz5L6U5pY5 FtOrLUHXmEDeCvtO1jKXunCF325lCija+7EU24YtYlCrJoo+JVDNUKIuCRoJhF90k4a5 sj0wbLySJTY26JdV53pvF9gjkk6nLeRskrzu2+vBRc9enKZ1/YPWM2mGW9TjGrN7Nsgt oB/T5R2EjpRcyyB4bfOKTSkg7BHG7mv9GLEOgwQ18fcZrD7/fuEQbhp3zE3i47Lccwad T4Lg==
X-Received: by 10.60.147.130 with SMTP id tk2mr18803940oeb.68.1411701242193; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.15.119] (ip68-100-74-115.dc.dc.cox.net. [68.100.74.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm2473934oex.12.2014.09.25.20.14.00 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Eric Burger <mep27rym@gmail.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F0C9CBBE-51AD-4415-B332-C624EAE2F933"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Message-Id: <E47E25F3-33E9-40D2-B97F-148C771770B9@cs.georgetown.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:13:58 -0400
References: <5424D0BF.3020800@gmail.com> <DEE2D5B8-CF87-4A0D-9838-55842A665791@cisco.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DEE2D5B8-CF87-4A0D-9838-55842A665791@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SsJO9VcKfwqbCq8CcZBVxgR1n24
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 03:14:04 -0000
Interesting. From 1998 on it looks like we go from 10% of ID’s becoming RFCs to 5%. A combination of having a typical RFC being published after draft-15, as well as a ton of -00’s that go nowhere, perhaps? On Sep 25, 2014, at 11:02 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do we have somewhere data on the number of drafts submitted per year? >> >> Melinda > > First place I’d ask is the RFC Editor. But... > > Using the rsync archive at rsync.ietf.org... > > I did an ls -lrt on the file of “all internet drafts since” someone started recording them, and all RFCs. I’m not convince that the year they wound of in the archive is the year in the index file, but I don’t feel like trying to parse the index file. But doing that and then gripping for year numbers (and noting that digit-digit-:-digit-digit is at the moment equivalent to “2014") > > > year drafts RFCs > 1968 0 > 1969 0 > 1970 0 > 1971 0 > 1972 0 > 1973 0 > 1974 2 > 1975 0 > 1976 0 > 1977 0 > 1978 0 > 1979 0 > 1980 0 > 1981 1 > 1982 0 > 1983 0 > 1984 0 > 1985 0 > 1986 22 > 1987 43 > 1988 43 > 1989 51 > 1990 0 59 > 1991 0 125 > 1992 140 368 > 1993 8 175 > 1994 210 183 > 1995 721 126 > 1996 1409 174 > 1997 1688 388 > 1998 2896 272 > 1999 2708 269 > 2000 3369 426 > 2001 4355 320 > 2002 4758 233 > 2003 4969 312 > 2004 4763 281 > 2005 4933 327 > 2006 5066 469 > 2007 4954 324 > 2008 5115 309 > 2009 5431 291 > 2010 6242 403 > 2011 6495 390 > 2012 6974 339 > 2013 6629 275 > 2014 1934 60 > : 3211 216
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Fred Baker (fred)
- Data on internet drafts/year? Melinda Shore
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Eric Burger
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Melinda Shore
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Melinda Shore
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Melinda Shore
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year? Hideki Sunahara