Re: this seems to have become broken some time back
Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 19 January 2011 02:09 UTC
Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55A03A70AB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:09:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXxeUkWfA0+3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from monster.hopcount.ca (monster.hopcount.ca [216.235.14.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB54B3A6DA7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [199.212.90.28] (helo=dh28.r1.owls.hopcount.ca) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@hopcount.ca>) id 1PfNb4-000Ajg-ON; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:16:32 +0000
Subject: Re: this seems to have become broken some time back
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <E48F738E-F0EB-4A91-BAB1-E01F2A0CF9F9@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:12:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5444AF4B-7A0A-4DE7-9F06-67535B1F5ECE@hopcount.ca>
References: <E48F738E-F0EB-4A91-BAB1-E01F2A0CF9F9@isi.edu>
To: bill manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 199.212.90.28
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on monster.hopcount.ca); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: bill manning <bmanning@sfc.keio.ac.jp>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:09:39 -0000
On 2011-01-18, at 15:03, bill manning wrote: > and I guess I am the only one who might still use it - but regardless, if its broken, it should .... seems that the mail attachment (MIME) is no longer a copy of the draft in question, its a dummy text block. I don't think it was ever a copy of the draft in question; it has been an RFC1873-compliant Message/External-Body section as long as I have been watching. To draw from another random example that came through recently on i-d-announce: > Content-Type: Message/External-body; > name="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-13.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; > access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" I've never used a mail client that knows what to do with that, though. Joe
- this seems to have become broken some time back bill manning
- Re: this seems to have become broken some time ba… Joe Abley
- Re: this seems to have become broken some time ba… ned+ietf
- Re: this seems to have become broken some time ba… Alessandro Vesely