RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La Hotel
Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com> Tue, 31 August 2010 01:28 UTC
Return-Path: <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111093A68CF; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yb9WQ7ct6QLZ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CAD3A6A2B; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L7Z00B1LTG15U@szxga05-in.huawei.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:28:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from c00111037 ([10.111.16.128]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L7Z001JLTFZDN@szxga05-in.huawei.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:28:49 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:28:47 +0800
From: Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La Hotel
In-reply-to: <4C7B3C24.4030909@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Message-id: <003501cb48ab$dcc9eee0$965dcca0$%cui@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-cn
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: ActIWEOuFtu7Rj4iRtis3wQrn3XwlQAUahww
References: <4C7B3C24.4030909@dcrocker.net>
Cc: IAOC@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:28:30 -0000
I just searched at google map, The result shows it is 1.6 kilometers away from the meeting venue hotel, or 1 mile, 20 minutes walk. Google map shows me three Nikko hotels around there, a bit confusing, luckily the map at Nikko hotel website http://www.newcenturyhotel.com.cn/en/hotel.html indicates the right one. Best Regards, Xiangsong > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave > CROCKER > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:06 PM > Cc: IAOC@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La Hotel > > Am I correctly reading that the overflow hotel for Beijing is approximately > eight (8) kilometers away from the primary hotel? > > If so, why? > > d/ > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La H… Dave CROCKER
- RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-… Xiangsong Cui
- RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-… Paul Hoffman