Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La Hotel
Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 30 August 2010 05:05 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84433A68E1; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ns7LShRykCv5; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC803A68A3; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ppp-68-122-73-240.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.73.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7U55dUc001650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:45 -0700
Message-ID: <4C7B3C24.4030909@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:40 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La Hotel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:21:39 -0700
Cc: IAOC@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:05:18 -0000
Am I correctly reading that the overflow hotel for Beijing is approximately eight (8) kilometers away from the primary hotel? If so, why? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-La H… Dave CROCKER
- RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-… Xiangsong Cui
- RE: Hotel Nikko (overflow) distance from Shangri-… Paul Hoffman