IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 31 March 2016 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC36912D0B2; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZPQDK3wlxpP; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC7912D561; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27672CCBF; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 01:53:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55agp2dXaf0O; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 01:53:43 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C07F2CC9A; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 01:53:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7BDD1ADD-6196-46D9-8442-150858FDFA27"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <94D503BD-C0B7-45B1-A0C7-C615D5B527DC@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:53:39 -0300
Message-Id: <ED4F41F0-55A5-4DD9-80E2-1326C33D280E@piuha.net>
References: <56F6F0D6.9090300@gmail.com> <9928323F-BBDA-475B-B3E5-442676405C5B@qti.qualcomm.com> <56FB3298.9040209@gmail.com> <94D503BD-C0B7-45B1-A0C7-C615D5B527DC@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VXBn2qMtQwXz-P4E6gr569QUNl8>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-bradner-rfc3979bis.all@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:53:49 -0000

Brian, Pete:

> I see your point, though. Would you buy something like this?
> 
> "...see [RFC6701] for details of the sanctions defined in
> various existing Best Current Practice documents".
> 
> Sure, no objection to that if it makes you more comfortable.

WFM.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email