Re: [IETF] Last Call: <draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02.txt> (Special Use IPv4 Addresses) to Best Current Practice

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sun, 22 July 2012 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6DA21F85D7; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWP8DZKmRF26; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEEA21F852B; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.242.9.248] (m2d0f36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.15.45]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CA4C1B405FA; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:44:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [IETF] Last Call: <draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02.txt> (Special Use IPv4 Addresses) to Best Current Practice
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA0BCF7C76@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:18:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D602BA3-CF79-4A3B-BDAD-3F0B6461075F@kumari.net>
References: <20120712224629.14063.15257.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m24npbckns.wl%randy@psg.com> <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA0BCF7C76@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:43:45 -0000

On Jul 14, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:

> Very useful document, certainly worth publishing.

+1

> It is one of those documents that needs frequent updates.
> 

+1

> RFC 6052, IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators, makes reference to a predecessor of this document, stating in section 3.1 that "The Well-Known Prefix MUST NOT be used to represent non-global IPv4 addresses, such as those defined in [RFC1918] or listed in Section 3 of [RFC5735]." I assume that implementers will automatically upgrade their code to reference the new version.
> 

-1 -- I would not assume any such thing. I *might* guess that implementors will include the new version in new / updated code, but the not necessarily the "automatically" bit :-P

W

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:21 PM
> To: IETF Disgust; The IESG
> Subject: [IETF] Re: Last Call: <draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02.txt> (Special Use IPv4 Addresses) to Best Current Practice
> 
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to 
>> consider the following document:
>> - 'Special Use IPv4 Addresses'
>>   <draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02.txt> as Best Current Practice
> 
> read and support
> 
> randy
> 
> 

--
"Working the ICANN process is like being nibbled to death by ducks,
it takes forever, it doesn't make sense, and in the end we're still dead in the water." 
    -- Tom Galvin, VeriSign's vice president for government relations.