Re: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 05 January 2015 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53E71A8A69; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:07:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPTB-W3g7rOK; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D221A8A67; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Y8ErU-00063C-Ok; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:06:53 +0000
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 06:06:51 +0900
Message-ID: <m2bnmdym1g.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
In-Reply-To: <96B524C4-B2E8-443E-871D-60B5FCD2F44A@ogud.com>
References: <4E0F5009-4811-4FFE-AA26-ECFAC2398101@ogud.com> <m28uhj2wxg.wl%randy@psg.com> <96B524C4-B2E8-443E-871D-60B5FCD2F44A@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VorsAmGq3F3d23LO5hqmxpvpxhs
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extension@tools.ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:07:12 -0000

>>> The document contains no issues from a security perspective as it is
>>> only creating LSA’s for new types of route selection metrics, time
>>> instead of network hops.
>> 
>> and the new lsas could not be used in path shortening attacks, right?
>
> this document only defines the format of the LSA’s it does
> not talk about processing by the routing engines. 

so the secdir sees no need to warn about it.  got it.  </sarcasm>

randy