Re: e2e
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Fri, 27 July 2007 04:37 UTC
Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEHaG-0000jO-Lu; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEHaF-0000jJ-1m for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:47 -0400
Received: from machshav.com ([198.180.150.44]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEHaE-0000MK-Fo for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:47 -0400
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 46874B5F7; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from berkshire.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A42B584 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by berkshire.machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 54047) id 3F852766084; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:45 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <20070726232013.30BFF136C82@aharp.ittns.northwestern.edu> <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20070727043745.3F852766084@berkshire.machshav.com>
X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 0f1ff0b0158b41ac6b9548d0972cdd31
Subject: Re: e2e
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
But I should point people at RFC 4924. (No, I won't try to summarize it.) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- e2e John Kristoff
- Re: e2e Scott Brim
- Re: e2e Lixia Zhang
- Re: e2e Noel Chiappa
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: e2e Joel Jaeggli
- Re: e2e Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: e2e Brian E Carpenter
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Greg Skinner
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Gunnar Lindberg
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Ted Hardie
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- RE: e2e SM
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- RE: e2e SM
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Keith Moore
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Douglas Otis
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John Levine
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: e2e SM
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… SM
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… SM
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Michael Thomas
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: e2e John Day
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) SM
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e John C Klensin
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis