Re: e2e
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 27 July 2007 12:36 UTC
Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEP3t-0005DX-5g; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:36:53 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEP3r-0005DI-LM for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:36:51 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEP3r-0002wf-4h for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:36:51 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f1so89828rvb for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KqV6Ack7qVypMnyD+kb8a3nwPqr6UHtRzWcppRyVGTe90E/xfaVy3YD5vMtbbAeK7mvyLdsQvQve5pQ20Z9mPZmDTi+AuH20x4hXQk6UA+9KqyjjgBCPiZYfRk50uUBDxfIw8T/DHWwFbBDuGCF1dfRyH+XVIvOxtnyKhGXHyCs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bBdAnWsqgYUOq5aagGZoiJYeQwMh1Du4Th14YbaeVwT4nD50o9neFpPCwlHPxSVxyM5SMUHsgYjWLG6rbrEl1ex54Tegq4zXabybx7K+NcATPTeK2yZaJfMFKLPLqNhxC2O76TqifykwpBNQQdxvqdTdMSrLrmY7KsdE8UzadPc=
Received: by 10.141.32.8 with SMTP id k8mr916351rvj.1185539810366; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?172.28.168.127? ( [67.97.210.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f28sm5269257rvb.2007.07.27.05.36.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46A9E6E1.9070600@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:36:49 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20070726232013.30BFF136C82@aharp.ittns.northwestern.edu> <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20070727043745.3F852766084@berkshire.machshav.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070727043745.3F852766084@berkshire.machshav.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Subject: Re: e2e
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On 2007-07-27 06:37, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > But I should point people at RFC 4924. (No, I won't try to summarize > it.) Not forgetting RFC 1958, of course. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- e2e John Kristoff
- Re: e2e Scott Brim
- Re: e2e Lixia Zhang
- Re: e2e Noel Chiappa
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: e2e Joel Jaeggli
- Re: e2e Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: e2e Brian E Carpenter
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Greg Skinner
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Gunnar Lindberg
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Ted Hardie
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- RE: e2e SM
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- RE: e2e SM
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Keith Moore
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Douglas Otis
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John Levine
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: e2e SM
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… SM
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… John C Klensin
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re:… SM
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Michael Thomas
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Fred Baker
- Re: e2e Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: e2e John Day
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: e2e Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e) michael.dillon
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) John C Klensin
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Douglas Otis
- Re: e2e Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) SM
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e) Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Tony Finch
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Keith Moore
- RE: e2e michael.dillon
- Re: e2e John C Klensin
- Re: e2e Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: e2e Douglas Otis