IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Tue, 29 June 2021 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB523A18CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZ9dUWIrQuZR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEF73A18CE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id f11so439873plg.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=N+p5u7keUwStPMnW90s4EIIJ/tU9tN0u1xu0Wm75Jk0=; b=BItAlsdbUecsIqPIhS/YGaUN0JRkNSMZ0R16loWRieoOLhNpTjEFp0e/oy5doVt6Kz GnAh5HtvHMoTbydji/8E4b5+kjDG1uPWR3eNvUiMUQ9FKfXDUCCCJj/4HG9vFyJiGOiA aHB7CFKrrXPBzTBWchXBcmioC+pfEM42tY+++wdkWdt6YaKT7X9gnGWGe4zgs9M5MIhI +TmP6f+or3y0PFWqw73BGuB7sS2Zs+eHiCRVVOKNjbiuGKY66geobc4tpSI3hSnIttCB szMUecJXBNZmR/aRUHtwfrFzQd38RELvV6DOXm+StZHjxmZyEgRuUxyA6YK71/tqWd3Z /SEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=N+p5u7keUwStPMnW90s4EIIJ/tU9tN0u1xu0Wm75Jk0=; b=ohTH05EWV0z+tbcQLxFbMbv74ONQpg1oaO9V1lM00EruQz7n7sZWmEjNQ5/YGF9/sd 08Ec1mdPfCK2GnxDvXkqAxVL5fwgBDqKT3foypyh3UNrrtxA2ia2ygKOxndUPhw/3Cq7 UpQYXfswWNlIePWmlh/33qBk+2bhPvhqe+5qxJLKmo3+7RtxZhAgDSnZ6jx8TYm2pVdq HFJHzJKJdN4eHbb6B8sk+1x4md179VPrWiFh4MFtDQtWwqequqLDXoFkQw/WxZPzqVhJ FgRoVRazoxAW7FUcZQe/Nt4qSzIwnRdXb700GvHrNmnbVbAKOgi3L751468nMI4t6ET/ +c1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Fk+JMiSiH1HvmXI0x0eSfAbc07CsyUdJSDlnCyZqPnLL9X9Gs z+Ly0IekTsTgkS9HmWSKpxV3P4DY9D8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbmRb94RvEhPKD+n4lMIKZwp2uuMGTknUckDZy6WusY8d5ADZ4o5a1pTTR6L8Rhx3NNT2iHw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:30c2:: with SMTP id hi2mr1252820pjb.130.1625008687037; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TVPC (c-73-158-116-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.116.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm18846083pfb.114.2021.06.29.16.18.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Masinter" <lmm@acm.org>
To: 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <phill@hallambaker.com>, 'Nick Hilliard' <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: 'IETF Discussion Mailing List' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiFajxuV3E_u7b-f=7DqTHXG_4Y=VLoCsUxknD_mCp1=Q@mail.gmail.com> <00722e06-a385-251c-d95d-2ff67e83f5c1@foobar.org> <CAMm+LwgwwX4zhqqH27FtBEyKRn74BdunswpembR_O6R34vTuSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgwwX4zhqqH27FtBEyKRn74BdunswpembR_O6R34vTuSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:18:05 -0700
Message-ID: <00c401d76d3d$0477c630$0d675290$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C5_01D76D02.58198A70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQDp3nVgA4cREV60CgmGfZbQFYi3CwF/68qdAiqprWms6WONMA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/W7rbATkGqiak2f6bkx51H_iTr0M>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 23:18:13 -0000

Building Blocks for HTTP APIs (httpapi) - (ietf.org) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpapi/about/> 

Might be a more evolutionary approach.

Perhaps an update to BCP 56 (RFC 3205) might be in order.

--

 <https://LarryMasinter.net> https://LarryMasinter.net  <https://interlisp.org> https://interlisp.org

 

RFC 2324 

   HTTP 1.1 ([RFC2068 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068> ]) permits the transfer of web objects from origin

   servers to clients. The web is world-wide.  HTCPCP is based on HTTP.

   This is because HTTP is everywhere. It could not be so pervasive

   without being good. Therefore, HTTP is good. If you want good coffee,

   HTCPCP needs to be good. To make HTCPCP good, it is good to base

   HTCPCP on HTTP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email