Re: I-D Action: draft-resnick-on-consensus-07.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 18 April 2014 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0071A01F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9tvM7UUh9Kn7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854591A01F0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0152CCD0; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:42:23 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Bgb86T_xTsu; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:42:22 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2092CC48; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:42:22 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-resnick-on-consensus-07.txt
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140415165420.12029.87582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:42:21 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A674FF20-F58C-446D-972E-13045EB67519@piuha.net>
References: <20140415165420.12029.87582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org List" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XB5sZ-Y-oEL_6nd-qHS5IP3MgJU
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:42:30 -0000

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> ...
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-resnick-on-consensus/
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-resnick-on-consensus-07

For your information, there is a new version of this draft. The IESG had approved it earlier, but there were some comments from the IESG reviews (particularly from Adrian) as well as from a review by Dave Crocker. I wanted to give Pete an opportunity to address those comments, and after discussion with me he and decided that these changes are appropriate. The main changes relate to pointing out that resolving disagreements is not the only thing that is needed for a successful consensus, and clarifying limitations of humming.

I plan to send the document to the RFC editor in the next week or so.

Jari