Re: [IAB] IAB appeal for arpa assignment

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35D93A2184; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:12:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NP1MiBcv2QM4; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:12:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088B83A1706; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOxnN-1kh0Ua2dhX-006RJP; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:09:27 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:09:24 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2066375048.13352.1605114564874@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <786445269.623526.1596516816575@email.ionos.com>
References: <48148394.755622.1596165417606@email.ionos.com> <CANk3-ND=uJdr0hA017qGzRH8j15Ty5MEykkDddFTuqt6J2M4zQ@mail.gmail.com> <1328613138.1101416.1596513465285@email.ionos.com> <yblzh7buj7e.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <786445269.623526.1596516816575@email.ionos.com>
Subject: Re: [IAB] IAB appeal for arpa assignment
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:bw1F+ar4Z89mYxUtdHsFbHkGqquChRbfcSTVLeqkWF48M7bgRAg eYvda+kqgMRxdXArlcogqd5K/MjBLIwz0WKsZd6Ovqn4QGtTMLsqiYO/afKAbv4FYdLphz0 HmQJ1jYCtBnq1qjqHvu4VgMuI62vETrVF6rNJkySo+Pl1wj2IwOXA3S+1jWWj7EQcqbtT6a aHpRXpiEwLBOvSxIlnK6w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:LjhorWcr44c=:gpqEhSjznSWD7a3yl3Y+hR RRS9uqxY14ZTUU2oakma+9iFJ8guJJor31CNfNMiSvIsXmmIyrM2YCMTWKrp10wtLHJ8elr/H J411c1etOwir5Gnyt2R/gFR/zu0LKLXlVj9GPvOn/dCAcQWYJ+sD1usrjBQnbRhINL0jO079h 8Uc98glHjc7wKa4u18Noap7yNS6KGIaMbLYv8GqbB80g2HK/rYQ0/E22rQXInCHq1kKTkbqSB 7d5Du+xGmuIe9h6xq2xY6RK85nvpiE1Ekc2dcipBd1TCKS2D1PTRJ14kv7oS9383JYlEFBLO8 WpPxQHYOLGPBu4gStBHyiSrt3EMN4E8od37v7P42qHS5dF5mODn//8e4ax7pMbga+6mA1rqtO AZaIkcT/ofsqzj69JjPSLDK/fap7seChTisghvkdaUZk7LBFLvEd1RCrfJaSMA5F9VECVIHtY rzupUGo7vA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XWtA9MlQ-lBEz4U0_VNuNyYx9As>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:12:59 -0000

> On 08/04/2020 12:53 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ok thank you Wes.
> 
> I know that the members of the IESG and the IAB are highly skilled seasoned professionals and in a group they are a formidable bunch. I was wondering, what help is available to appellants like myself who are basically noobs to the entire process?
> 
> Tim
> > On August 4, 2020 at 12:29 AM Wes Hardaker < wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Timothy,
> > 
> > > In the IESG appeal I listed every decision I could think of but this time I
> > > would like to avoid that. There are some decisions that the IESG made that
> > > I may be unaware of making it difficult for me to pick. Section 8 of RFC
> > > 2026 says"
> > > 
> > > Each of the organizations involved in the development and approval of
> > > Internet Standards shall publicly announce, and shall maintain a
> > > publicly accessible record of, every activity in which it engages, to
> > > the extent that the activity represents the prosecution of any part
> > > of the Internet Standards Process.
> > > 
> > > Can you please post the previous draft(s) of the final IESG decisions
> > > and any other activity engaged in for that final decision of my appeal?
> > The IAB does not have access to "previous draft(s)" of documents
> > authored by the IESG. If they do exist, we wouldn't know about it or
> > have them unless they were provided to us [they weren't, as far as I
> > know].
> > 
> > [speaking for myself, not for the whole of the IAB] Although I'm the IAB
> > liason to the IESG, I am not a core member of the IESG and thus was not
> > privy to the conversations about your appeal to the IESG. Thus, I must
> > base any conclusions I have on your desire for an appeal to the IAB
> > based on the information I can gather, which would certainly include the
> > IESG's response regarding the appeal and, hopefully, your view of
> > where and why that response was incorrect.
> > 
> > --
> > Wes Hardaker
> > USC/ISI