Re: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Fri, 13 January 2017 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E344129CEC; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:44:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWRKRIWYVYDM; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.157.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578E2129CDC; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id v0DHhrvT111776 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:43:54 -0500
Subject: Re: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, draft-murchison-webdav-prefer@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <6cf3c045-0f66-e172-3f2d-80112a665f11@gmail.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Message-ID: <4ac858ec-aad5-d2bc-29b3-10d7492f126a@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:43:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6cf3c045-0f66-e172-3f2d-80112a665f11@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.3.0.2556906, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.3.29.195115
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 28% ( SXL_IP_DYNAMIC 3, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1500_1599 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_RESIDENTIAL 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MAL_TELEKOM_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __RDNS_POOLED_1 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SINGLE_URI_TEXT 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __URI_WITH_PATH 0, __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 28%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 128.2.157.39
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_AD4zekW42GI4_VPwVs0m4n22EI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:44:43 -0000

Hi Stewart,

Thanks for the review.  Both items have been addressed in version 14.


On 01/13/2017 11:27 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 13 Jan 2016
> IETF LC End Date: 16 January 2017
> IESG Telechat date: 19 January 2017
>
>
> Summary: Ready with nits
>
> This is a well written document with two minor editorial issues 
> remaining from the version previously reviewed.
>
>
> Issues:
>
> From ID-nits:
>
>   -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC7240,
>      but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.
>
>   Specifically I think the nits checker is looking to see RFC724O
>   called up in the Abstract.
>
>
>
> =========
> It says in section 5
>
> 5.  Implementation Status
>
>    < RFC Editor: before publication please remove this section, the
>    reference to [RFC7942], and any "URIs" section >
>
> I think you ned the whole of section 9.3 to be deleted. If that is so
> it would be clearer to the editor to say so.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University