Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Wed, 10 August 2005 20:04 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E2wo1-0000Fc-HN; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:04:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E2wo0-0000FU-FD; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:04:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28034; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2xM9-0003Pv-U8; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:39:23 -0400
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j7AK3pf15705; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:03:51 +0300
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:03:51 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: iesg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <E1E2vaU-0005nH-S9@newodin.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508102255560.15537@netcore.fi>
References: <E1E2vaU-0005nH-S9@newodin.ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
> following document:
>
> - 'Internet Code Point Assignments '
>   <draft-gray-rfc1888bis-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
> iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-09-07.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gray-rfc1888bis-01.txt

The title is inappropriately generic.

Given RFC 4048, is there sufficient evidence that this would be useful 
to the operational (or any other) community ?

(Being more explicit on this draft's relationship to RFC 1888 and 4048 
would not hurt in general.)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf